Regarding explicit numerical schemes based on finite differences:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks about explicit numerical schemes based on finite differences and presents a single possible statement to evaluate.
Option: 'They are stable provided certain conditions on Δt or Δx are met.'
First, consider what explicit finite-difference schemes are: they advance the solution using known values from the previous time step, without solving a system at each step. Stability for these schemes is not guaranteed unconditionally; it typically depends on the chosen time step Δt relative to spatial discretization Δx.
A common way to express this dependency is through a CFL-type condition (for hyperbolic problems) or a diffusion-type condition (for parabolic problems). In many diffusion-like equations, the explicit scheme requires Δt to be sufficiently small compared to Δx^2 to maintain stability, for example Δt ≤ C * Δx^2 / ν, where ν is a diffusivity and C is a method-specific constant. For hyperbolic problems, a condition like Δt ≤ C * Δx / a (where a is a wave speed) may apply. These relationships show that stability hinges on satisfying certain bounds involving Δt and Δx.
Therefore, the statement that explicit schemes are stable provided certain conditions on Δt or Δx are met captures a core aspect of their behavior: stability is conditional, not unconditional, and the specific bounds depend on the equation and the chosen scheme. If the question intends to claim unconditional stability, that would be inaccurate, because many explicit schemes become unstable without acceptable Δt-Δx relationships.
Potential misconceptions to guard against: assuming all explicit schemes are stable for any Δt or Δx; forgetting that boundary conditions, source terms, and the PDE type (elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic) affect stability; overlooking that the stability condition is tied to the particular finite-difference stencil and discretization order. Conversely, recognizing the need for a time-step restriction aligns with standard stability analyses such as von Neumann (linearized) stability and CFL-type arguments.
In summary, the core idea expressed in the option aligns with established results: explicit finite-difference schemes typically require certain inequalities relating Δt and Δx to hold in order to be stable. The exact form of the condition depends on the PDE and the scheme, but the necessity of a bound is a fundamental feature of explicit methods.

Regarding explicit numerical schemes based on finite differences:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

For the information shown, what is the correct option for 'X'?

Regarding explicit numerical schemes based on finite differences:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler