This quiz is aimed at generating a first round of discussion about our first exposure to feminist questions in relation to art history.
True or False?

Elizabeth Cropper...

(E) writes that Artemisia very self-consciously strove for fame by actively vying for commissions and engaging in complex rhetorical exercises in flattery and self-deprecation in which her womanhood served as a tool for advancement.

Question

This quiz is aimed at generating a first round of discussion about our first exposure to feminist questions in relation to art history. 
True or False?

Elizabeth Cropper...

(E)    writes that Artemisia very self-consciously strove for fame by actively vying for commissions and engaging in complex rhetorical exercises in flattery and self-deprecation in which her womanhood served as a tool for advancement.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question and options recap:
- Statement to evaluate (True/False): Elizabeth Cropper … writes that Artemisia very self-consciously strove for fame by actively vying for commissions and engaging in complex rhetorical exercises in flattery and self-deprecation in which her womanhood served as a tool for advancement.

Option A: True
- This option would be accurate if Cropper presents Artemisia Gentileschi as deliberately pursuing fame and recognition, employing strategic rhetoric, courting commissions, and using self-deprecating and flattering maneuvers, with gendered positioning (womanhood) as a lever for advancement. If Cropper emphasizes Artemisia’s conscious career-building, agency, and deliberate rhetorical tactics to secure commissions, this option aligns with that portrayal. Think about whether Cropper frames Artemisia as an active negotiator of her social position, rather than a passive recipient of opportunities. A correct answer here would hinge on explicit statements or strongly supported readings in Cropper’s text about Artemisia orchestrating her public image and leveraging gender expectations to gain prestige.
- Why this could be right: It foregrounds agency and tactical self-presentation, which some feminist art historical readings attribute to Artemisia as a means to break barriers and secure patronage. The “self-consciously” element signals intentionality, and the mention of flattery and self-deprecation suggests a crafted performance of womanhood as a tool for advancement, which Cropper might discuss in analyses of gendered patronage and reputation.
- Possible pitfalls if this is incorrect: If Cropper instead emphasizes structural constraints, patronage networks, or historical contexts that limit Artemisia’s autonomy, or if she portrays Artemisia as largely fortuitous rather than strategically calculated, then this option could misrepresent the author’s view. Additionally, if Cropper critiques the idea that gendered rhetoric was a straightforward route to advancement (seeing it as risky, contested, or limited), the statement would be overstated.

Option B: False
- This option would be accurate if Cropper does not present Artemisia as deliberately pursuing fame through commissions or if she argues that using gendered rhetoric and self-presentation as a career strategy was not an accurate or primary reading of Artemisia’s career. If Cropper emphasizes other aspects—such as technical innovation, stylistic development, patrons’ complicity, or the social constraints Artemisia faced—without describing her as actively employing calculated rhetorical strategies to advance her fame, then this statement could be considered false.
- Why this could be wrong: The claim requires Cropper to explicitly negate Artemisia’s strategic self-fashioning and agency in pursuing fame. If Cropper’s analysis, in contrast, highlights Artemisia’s calculated self-presentation, engagement with patrons, and gendered positioning as a deliberate means to gain commissions, labeling the statement false would misrepresent the author’s interpretation.
- Potential confusions: Feminist art history often discusses agency and tactical self-presentation; if Cropper’s argument centers on systemic constraints or critiques the sufficiency of gendered tactics, readers might misread the extent of Artemisia’s deliberate strategies. The accuracy of labeling this as false depends on how Cropper balances agency with structural pressures.

Synthesis to guide judgment:
- To determine which option is correct, compare the exact phrasing used by Cropper about Artemisia’s actions: does she depict Artemisia as consciously maneuvering for fame through commissions and as employing rhetoric around womanhood as advancement? If yes, the statement aligns with Cropper’s portrayal and would be true. If not, or if she stresses alternative explanations (e.g., circumstances, patronage systems, or art historical context) that do not frame Artemisia’s actions as deliberate self-promotional tactics, the statement would be false.
- Pay attention to qualifiers: words like 'self-consciously', 'actively vying', 'complex rhetorical exercises', and 'womanhood served as a tool' signal an interpretation of strategic agency. Verify whether Cropper explicitly uses or endorses this combination of tactics and gendered positioning.

Overall guidance:
- If the text presents Artemisia as a conscious career strategist employing gendered rhetoric to obtain commissions, choose True. If the text argues that such a reading overstates Artemisia’s agency or that Cropper foregrounds other factors over gendered self-presentation, choose False.
- In answering, reflect on whether the analysis centers on Artemisia’s deliberate self-fashioning for fame or on broader contextual factors that shaped her career without portraying her as actively crafting a strategic, gendered path to advancement.

ART H 200 A Artemisia Graded Quiz, after discussion

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler