This quiz is aimed at generating a first round of discussion about our first exposure to feminist questions in relation to art history.
True or False?

Elizabeth Cropper...

(B) writes that Artemisia was a great painter because she had the luxury of studying with her father, who was friends with Caravaggio and therefore was able to get many commissions.

Question

This quiz is aimed at generating a first round of discussion about our first exposure to feminist questions in relation to art history. 
True or False?

Elizabeth Cropper...

(B) writes that Artemisia was a great painter because she had the luxury of studying with her father, who was friends with Caravaggio and therefore was able to get many commissions.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's break down the two answer choices in relation to the prompt about Elizabeth Cropper and Artemisia.
Option 1: 'True' — This would claim that the statement as written is correct: that Elizabeth Cropper asserts Artemisia Gentileschi was a great painter because she had the luxury of studying with her father, who was friends with Caravaggio and thus secured many commissions.
What to consider here is what Cropper emphasizes in her discussions of feminist art history. Cropper tends to foreground broader social, educational, and institutional contexts that shape women artists' opportunities, rather than attributing a painter’s greatness to a single familial connection or network. If Cropper’s analysis centers on structural constraints, mentorship networks, and the ways gender and patronage affected Artemisia’s career, she would likely avoid attributing her greatness solely to studying with a father who happened to know Caravaggio. Therefore, labeling Artemisia’s stature as a direct result of that specific familial luxury would be an oversimplification that doesn’t align with Cropper’s broader methodological approach.
Option 2: 'False' — This would indicate that the statement as presented is not accurate. The reasoning for marking it false is that Cropper would not credit Artemisia’s artistic greatness solely to the chance of studying with her father or to that father’s connections to Caravaggio and the resulting commissions. Instead, Cropper would argue for a more nuanced reading that considers Artemisia’s own skill, training under a contested and politicized art market, and the gendered dynamics of patronage and reception in her era.
Now, examining the incorrectness of Option 1 more specifically: it reduces a complex feminist and art-historical argument to a single causal factor (a fatherly studio environment and a Caravaggio-connected network). It ignores Artemisia’s proven technical ability, her extensive independent workshop practice, and the critical scholarship that analyzes how gender, reputation, and market forces interacted in early modern Rome. This simplification is where the claim falls short.
Comparing the options, Option 2 correctly signals that the reason given in the statement (the luxury of studying with her father and the Caravaggio connection leading to many commissions) does not capture Cropper’s likely emphasis on a fuller, context-rich reading of Artemisia’s career. It challenges the notion that greatness is reducible to such connective advantages and aligns with Cropper’s critique of reductive biographical narratives about women artists.
In summary, option-by-option: the 'True' choice would be a simplistic, potentially misrepresentative reading of Cropper’s position, while the 'False' choice recognizes the need for a more nuanced, context-aware interpretation of Artemisia’s work and career as discussed in feminist art-historical scholarship. The key misstep in the true statement is the attribution of Artemisia’s greatness to a single mentorship and patronage chain, rather than to a broader set of factors that Cropper would emphasize.

ART H 200 A Artemisia Graded Quiz, after discussion

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler