While flipping through a health magazine, Rob, 21, comes across an article that is advocating a particular form of exercise for prevention of arthritis. Rob does not think that he is at any risk for arthritis as he has been very healthy and he believes that arthritis occurs mostly in elderly adults. According to the Extended Parallel Process Model, which of the following outcomes is most likely to occur?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) for Rob's reaction to the health magazine article, we start by considering his perceived susceptibility and perceived severity, which together form the perceived threat. Rob believes arthritis affects mainly elderly adults and that he is not at risk, so his perceived susceptibility is low. This means the perceived threat is weak, and the fear-arousal aspect of the message is unlikely to be persuasive in a way that prompts protective action.

Option 1: Rob will ignore the article. This is consistent with EPPM when the perceived threat is low; people do not engage in danger- or fear-reduction responses because they do not feel threatened enough to motivate action. Since Rob does not see himself at risk, the article is unlikely to motivate serious contemplation or behavior change.

Option 2: Rob will exhibit a fear control response. Fear control responses typically arise when perceived threat is high but perceived efficacy is low; the person focuses on mitigating fear rather than addressing the danger (e.g., denial, avoidance). In Rob’s case, the threat is perceived as low, not high, so a fear-control reaction is less plausible.

Option 3: Rob will exhibit a damage control response. The term 'damage control' is not a standard category in EPPM. The model specifies two main outcomes: danger control (adaptive actions to reduce threat) and fear control (emotional coping to reduce fear). Since one of these labels does not align with EPPM, this option is inaccurate.

Option 4: Rob will exhibit both a fear control and damage control response. Because EPPM distinguishes between fear control and danger control as alternative, mutually exclusive pathways depending on threat and efficacy appraisals, a combined presentation of both responses is not typically supported. Given the low threat perception, neither fear control nor danger control is likely to be engaged in a way that suggests a simultaneous dual response.

In summary, the key reason Option 1 is correct is that Rob’s low perceived susceptibility yields a low perceived threat, making ignoring the article the most probable outcome under EPPM. The other options mischaracterize the model’s pathways (option 3) or rely on scenarios (high threat with low efficacy or combined responses) that do not align with Rob’s stated beliefs (options 2 and 4).

CMN 101V A01-A02 SS1 2025 Graded Quiz #5

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler