What is a major flaw in how most jurisdictions currently set public transport fares and subsidies?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about a major flaw in how most jurisdictions currently set public transport fares and subsidies. Let's evaluate each option in turn, noting what it proposes and whether it reflects a systemic problem.

Option a: 'Fares are adjusted weekly based on the number of riders.' This describes a dynamic, demand-based pricing idea. While such adjustments could create complexity and potential inequities if not carefully designed, the statement does not itself claim that a broad, fundamental flaw exists across jurisdictions. It could be implemented in various ways, but the option does not assert a universal, structural shortcoming in fare policy.

Option b: 'Subsidies only apply during off-peak hours.' This implies a specific targeting approach that might limit subsidies to certain times. Even if this could be inefficient in some contexts or create incentives to shift travel, it describes a particular policy design choice rather than identifying a widespread, systemic flaw present in most jurisdictions.

Option c: 'Concession cards are only issued to people over the age of 65.' This is a policy design detail about eligibility criteria. While it could reflect a misalignment with equity goals if it excludes other groups in need, as a broad, overarching flaw it is too narrow and not representative of the entire spectrum of fare and subsidy design across jurisdictions.

Option d: 'Pricing strategies often fail to address equity or efficiency in a systematic way.' This statement points to a fundamental, structural concern: many fare and subsidy systems do not consistently balance equity (fair access across different income and usage groups) with efficiency (cost-effectiveness and optimal resource use). It highlights a core critique that applies across varied contexts, and it explains why many policies struggle to produce fair outcomes while also maintaining financial sustainability.

In light of these evaluations, the strongest, most general critique is encapsulated in option d. It identifies a broad, systemic issue rather than a specific design choice or isolated policy feature. The other options describe particular design elements or assumptions that, while potentially problematic, do not as directly claim a universal flaw in the way fares and subsidies are structured across jurisdictions.

Therefore, option d represents the major flaw being described, as it encompasses the core problem of failing to systematically address equity and efficiency in fare and subsidy policy across diverse contexts.

What is a major flaw in how most jurisdictions currently set public transport fares and subsidies?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What is a major flaw in how most jurisdictions currently set public transport fares and subsidies?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler