To properly evaluate a theory, you must ask: How can I prove this is wrong?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider the fundamentals of evaluating a theory by testing its falsifiability and potential for refutation.
Option 1: 'False' – If you deny the need to try to prove a theory wrong, you undermine the core scientific approach of critical testing. The idea that a theory should be immune to refutation runs counter to falsifiability, which is central to distinguishing testable beliefs from unfalsifiable conjectures.
Option 2: 'True' – This aligns with the scientific method: to evaluate a theory effectively, you should challenge it and seek ways to demonstrate error or inconsistency. Asking how to prove it wrong forces explicit hypotheses, potential counterexamples, and rigorous testing to identify limitations, scope, and boundary conditions.
Take a moment to compare the two stances: the first option promotes a defensive posture that avoids confrontation with possible flaws, which weakens theory assessment. The second option encourages proactive scrutiny, which improves robustness by exposing weaknesses and guiding refinement. 
In practical terms, asking how a theory could be falsified helps design experiments, collect data, and examine edge cases, thereby sharpening the theory or delimiting its applicability. This approach is a hallmark of robust scientific inquiry, as opposed to accepting a theory without challenge. 
Therefore, choosing the 'True' stance embodies the disciplined mindset required for proper theory evaluation, while the 'False' stance would lead to complacency and weaker conclusions.

BIOLOGY 109 001 WN 2025 Quiz 2

To properly evaluate a theory, you must ask: How can I prove this is wrong?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Falsifiability, which is one criterion of a useful theory, means that a theory can be proven right or wrong based on research findings or observations.

Which statement(s) best explain why Popper stressed falsifiability as well as testability for demarcating science from pseudo-science?

Which of the following is a NOT a strength of science?

For something to qualify as genuine scientific theory, it must be something that can potentially be proven either true or false.

For a concept or proposition to be a candidate for scientific theory, the concept must be capable of being proven true if it is true.

For something to qualify as genuine scientific theory, it must be something that can potentially be proven true.

A theory makes its predictions by telling you what will not be observed if it is correct.

A scientific hypothesis is________________, or capable of being shown to be incorrect.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler