When analyzing exploded view guidance, let’s evaluate each statement on its own terms. Option a: 'Parts should be exploded so that they are all clearly visible.' This is generally true for exploded views: the purpose is to reveal individual components and their relationships, so separating them enough to show details is appropriate. The wording emphasizes clarity and visibility, which aligns with standard drafting practice. Option b: 'Parts should be exploded as far as possible from each other.' This is typically inaccurate. Over-exploding parts can create confusion, obscure the assembly sequence, and make it harder to trace how components fit together. Exploded views aim for a balance where parts are spread enough to see them, but not so far apart that context is lost. Option c: 'Parts’ intended position can be easily figured out.' This is a reasonable characteristic of good exploded views: they convey the order and location of parts, enabling a viewer to comprehend how the assembly should be reassembled. While “easily” may vary with complexity, the goal is to make positional relationships evident. Option d: 'All parts don’t need to be exploded.' In practice, some assemblies show only a subset of components or omit parts that aren’t necessary to understand the mechanism or assembly order. This statement has some truth, but it depends on the purpose of the drawing; the blanket claim that all parts don’t need to be exploded is not universally correct and can be misleading if taken to mean never exposing component relationships. Here, it is not the strongest general guideline for essential exploded views. In summary, option a explains the clarity goal of exploding parts for visibility, option c reflects the informative aim of showing how parts relate in their positions, option b overstates spacing and can hinder comprehension, and option d introduces a conditional practice that isn’t a universal rule for exploded views. The reasoning supports selecting a and c as the appropriate characteristics of an effective exploded view.

Questions

BK10A6101 Technical Documentation and 3D Modeling - Monimuoto-opetus 2.9.2024-20.4.2025 Individual Exercise 4

Multiple choice

In exploded views...

Options

A.a. Parts should be exploded so that they are all clearly visible.

B.b. Parts should be exploded as far as possible from each other.

C.c. Parts' intended position can be easily figured out.

D.d. All parts don’t need to be exploded.

View Explanation

Verified Answer

Please login to view

Step-by-Step Analysis

When analyzing exploded view guidance, let’s evaluate each statement on its own terms. Option a: 'Parts should be exploded so that they are all clearly visible.' This is generally true for exploded views: the purpose is to reveal individual components and their relationships, so separating them enough to show details is appropriate. The wording emphasizes clarity and visibility, which aligns with standard dra......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!