Questions
Single choice
Your current disposable income is $10,000. There is a 10% chance you will get in a serious car accident, incurring damage of $1,900. (There is a 90% chance that nothing will happen.) Your utility function is , where I is income. If this policy is priced at $40, what is the change in your expected utility if you purchase the policy rather than no insurance?
View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
First, lay out the problem data and the assumed utility form. The current disposable income is 10,000. There is a 10% chance of a serious car accident causing a 1,900 loss, and a 90% chance nothing happens. The policy costs 40 and pays out to cover the loss, so if you buy the policy, regardless of whether the accident happens, your wealth is reduced......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
Which bets would a rational person definitely want to take, assuming they maximize expected utility: I. Win $1.5 if a coin comes up heads and lose $1 if a coin comes up tails II. Win $1.5 million if a coin comes up heads and lose $1 million if a coin comes up tails III. Win $1.5 if the S&P 500 rises by more than 10% next year; lose $1 if the S&P falls by more than 10% next year
[continues question 5] Then, given Jordan utility function,
Consider the risky investment we considered in class: Emma is considering buying a stock that has a 50% chance of being worth 10 and a 50% chance of being worth 70 at the future date on which she would want to sell the stock. Suppose Emma does some more analysis and changes her mind about the subjective probability distribution. The stock actually has a 50% chance of being worth 0 and a 50% chance of being worth 80. Given this change, which of the following statements is true?
Consider the risky investment we considered in class: Emma is considering buying a stock that has a 50% chance of being worth 10 and a 50% chance of being worth 70 at the future date on which she would want to sell the stock. Suppose Emma does some more analysis and changes her mind about the subjective probability distribution. The stock actually has a 50% chance of being worth 0 and a 50% chance of being worth 80. Given this change, which of the following statements is true?
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!