There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement to evaluate is: 'There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.'
Option 1: True. This would be an unusual stance, because assuming audiences won’t question data ignores the reality that readers often scrutinize sources, methods, and conclusions. It overlooks potential biases, the quality of the evidence, and the rigor of the research, making the claim inconsistent with best practices in critical thinking and scholarly communication.
Option 2: False. This option aligns with the idea that evaluating sources is essential for credibility. It recognizes that audiences may challenge data, check for reliability, examine authorship, publication venue, sample size, methodology, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest. It also emphasizes that transparent sourcing helps readers assess validity and reproducibility, and that researchers should anticipate questions rather than assume unquestioned acceptance.
Option 1 revisited: If one insisted that evaluation is unnecessary, it risks presenting weak or biased information as credible, which can undermine trust and invite scrutiny. The premise ignores how audiences typically verify claims, especially in academic, professional, or public-facing contexts.
Option 2 revisited: Emphasizing evaluation of sources encourages responsible communication, supports evidence-based conclusions, and prepares the presenter to address critiques with concrete, citable material. It also promotes consistency with standards for citing authority, methodology, and data integrity.

There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Explore the websites in the options below, which ones can you use for your written assessments for FOUND101 and FOUND201 and most of your university papers?

What type of source is this article most likely from?

As a student writing an academic paper, can a wiki such as Wikipedia or Investopedia ever be considered a useful resource?

What is the best reason for why is it important to read multiple sources of news?

How would you establish accuracy for a book? [check all that apply]

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler