Jamal has found an online source which he hopes to use in his essay. However, before doing so, he checks

1. who the author is

2. what type of credentials the author has

3. whether the author has any particular affiliations

By focusing on these three points, what exactly is Jamal evaluating about this article?

Question

Jamal has found an online source which he hopes to use in his essay. However, before doing so, he checks

1. who the author is

2. what type of credentials the author has

3. whether the author has any particular affiliations

By focusing on these three points, what exactly is Jamal evaluating about this article?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Jamal is assessing the source by looking at who wrote it, what credentials the author has, and any affiliations. This tendency centers on the idea of credibility and trustworthyness of the source.

Option 1: its accuracy. Accuracy concerns whether the information is correct and free from factual errors. While author credentials and affiliations can influence perceived accuracy, checking accuracy itself would involve verifying facts, data sources, evidence, and references within the content rather than focusing on the author’s identity and qualifications.

Option 2: its currency. Currency asks whether the information is up to date. This depends on the publication date and the evolution of the topic. The three points Jamal mentions (author, credentials, affiliations) do not explicitly address timeliness or recency, so this choice misaligns with the method described.

Option 3: its purpose. Purpose relates to why the article was written—intent, audience, potential biases, or propaganda. While these ideas are related to evaluating credibility, the specific focus Jamal describes is on the author’s identity and credentials, not the stated aim or intended function of the article itself.

Option 4: its authority. Authority is about the credibility and trustworthiness of the source, often assessed by who the author is, what credentials they hold, and what affiliations they maintain. The process Jamal follows directly maps to evaluating authority, since credentials and affiliations are core components of establishing authority.

In summary, the first three options touch on related aspects of evaluating sources, but they do not align as tightly with the explicit three-point method Jamal uses as option 4 does. Each choice reflects a different dimension of source evaluation, with option 4 matching the described focus on the author’s legitimacy and standing.

ISP010H5 F LEC9999 Unit 7 Quiz

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Explore the websites in the options below, which ones can you use for your written assessments for FOUND101 and FOUND201 and most of your university papers?

What type of source is this article most likely from?

As a student writing an academic paper, can a wiki such as Wikipedia or Investopedia ever be considered a useful resource?

What is the best reason for why is it important to read multiple sources of news?

How would you establish accuracy for a book? [check all that apply]

There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler