What must you discuss in your conclusion? (choose all that apply)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, I will restate what is provided to ensure clarity about the options we are evaluating.
Question: 'What must you discuss in your conclusion? (choose all that apply)'
Answer options provided (two items):
- Option A: 'Use all of your analysis and discussion in your body paragraphs and come to a fuller definition of what an unreliable narrator is and a conclusion about what the consequences of an unreliable narrator are for readers.'
- Option B: 'Your conclusion should, in a sense, be a fully explained and expanded thesis that gets to the heart of what an unreliable narrator is and what the consequences of an unreliable narrator are for readers.'

A note on the structure: there are no separate answer choices listed under answer_options, which means we are evaluating the two provided statements as candidate conclusions.

Analysis of Option A:
- This option suggests that the conclusion should incorporate all analysis and discussion that occurred in the body, and use that to arrive at a fuller definition of the unreliable narrator and its consequences for readers. One potential issue is that conclusions are typically a synthesis of the argument, not a recapitulation of every detail from the body; mentioning "all of your analysis and discussion" could imply repeating evidence rather than synthesizing it. However, it correctly recognizes the need to articulate the definition and discuss consequences, which are central elements of a conclusion in literary analysis.
- The merit here is emphasis on synthesis: using the body work to sharpen the definition and to draw conclusions about consequences for readers. A potential pitfall is verbosity and risk of simply restating evidence rather than presenting a concise, integrative synthesis.

Analysis of Option B:
- This option frames the conclusion as a fully explained and expanded thesis that gets to the heart of what the unreliable narrator is and what the consequences are for readers. This aligns with the idea that the conclusion should present a clear, argumentative synthesis—reaffirming the central claim (the understanding of the unreliable narrator) and the implications (consequences for readers).
- The strength here is a focused, thesis-like crispness that communicates the main point and its impact, which is often desirable in a strong conclusion. A potential concern is that a conclusion should not introduce entirely new arguments or only reiterate the thesis; instead, it should synthesize what has already been argued and illustrate its significance for readers.

Considering typical expectations for conclusions in literary analysis, both options touch on key elements: defining the unreliable narrator and discussing consequences for readers. However, Option A risks over-rehearsing the body or overloading the conclusion with all analysis, whereas Option B emphasizes a synthesized, expanded thesis that clearly states the core idea and its implications without introducing new evidence.

A potential ambiguity here is the absence of explicit answer options to choose from in the provided data structure. Since the question asks to choose all that apply and two statements are given, a cautious interpretation is to select the option(s) that best capture the purpose of a conclusion: synthesizing the argument, defining the concept, and outlining its implications for readers.

In sum, Option A emphasizes synthesis and a fuller definition plus consequences, while Option B emphasizes a thesis-like, expanded statement about the core idea and its consequences. Without an official rubric, both contain elements of a strong conclusion, but Option B more directly aligns with the idea of a concise, evaluative conclusion, whereas Option A warns against excessive restatement and encourages synthesis. To maximize alignment with standard pedagogy, a student would likely prefer Option B as the primary guideline and view Option A as a possible supplementary approach if appropriately concise.

ENGL 1B-Writing about Literature-501 Quiz Before You Submit Your Short Story Essay

What must you discuss in your conclusion? (choose all that apply)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following is an example of an effective conclusion for a cause and effect essay?

What is the purpose of a conclusion?

For the conclusion, which sentence(s) do the following? a. Summarise(s) the ideas in the essay [Fill in the blank] b. Make(s) a personal comment on the changes [Fill in the blank]

It is OK to acknowledge limitations of your essay in the conclusion

The conclusion should answer the essay question

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler