Founders should pay team members in stock to preserve cash

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks whether founders should pay team members in stock as a means to preserve cash, with two options: True or False.

Option 1: True. Some founders do use stock-based compensation to conserve cash in the early stages, aiming to align incentives and reduce immediate cash outlays. In practice, offering equity can help a startup attract talent when cash salaries are limited, and it creates upside if the company grows. However, this approach often comes with caveats such as dilution of ownership, equity valuation considerations, and the impact on vesting schedules and taxes for recipients.

Option 2: False. This stance argues that paying in stock is not a viable or recommended practice for preserving cash. Reasons against this view include the reality that equity can be a meaningful portion of total compensation, and in some contexts it is standard to offer stock options or RSUs to attract and retain employees when cash is tight. Yet, labeling stock payment as universally unacceptable ignores the strategic use of equity in startups, the potential legal and financial implications, and the fact that equity alone does not guarantee retention or motivation if not properly structured.

Option 1 expanded considerations: If stock is offered, it typically requires a clear plan around vesting, strike price tainting, and an understood valuation method to avoid misinterpretation or disputes later. Employers must also consider the tax treatment for recipients and the potential for perceived inequity if equity is distributed unevenly or without transparent criteria.

Option 2 expanded considerations: Claiming that stock compensation cannot preserve cash glosses over scenarios where cash flow is king and the company cannot fund salaries without some form of equity—yet it also highlights risks such as dilution risk for founders, potential misalignment if milestones are not met, and the complexity of issuing stock in a compliant manner.

Synthesis: Both sides acknowledge that stock-based pay can be a tool in cash-strapped environments, but the appropriateness, design, and implications matter greatly. The practical takeaway is that equity can help preserve cash under certain conditions, but it is not a universal solution and must be paired with sound compensation design, legal compliance, and clear communication to team members.

ENTR6212.30694.202530 Quiz 3

Founders should pay team members in stock to preserve cash

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In terms of reward emphasis, aggressive growth ventures provide

A firm that offers higher equity compensation generally attracts individuals who prefer risk taking.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler