Questions
Questions

BIOL3611.13541.202610 FA2GROUP_FA2025

Single choice

Indicate below the interpretation for the graph above

Options
A.enzymes do not affect the equilibrioum of a reaction since they affect thermodynamics
B.enzymes do not affect the equilibrioum of a reaction since they do not affect thermodynamics
C.the equilibrium of a reaction is independent of thermodynamics
D.the free energy is the only essential factor that contributes to product formation
Question Image
View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The question asks you to indicate the interpretation for the graph above. Examine each option carefully. Option 1: 'enzymes do not affect the equilibrioum of a reaction since they affect thermodynamics' This statement is flawed because it claims enzymes affect thermodynamics, which would imply a change in equilibrium, but in biochemistry enzymes are known to alter reaction rates (kin......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

Since citrate synthase exhibits sequential, ordered kinetics:

When Chapman et al. (1999) were determining the 5MDH structure of malate dehydrogenase, they provided the enzyme with tetrahydroNAD Links to an external site. instead of the closely-related endogenous substrate NAD+ Links to an external site. . They also provided alpha-ketomalonate Links to an external site. instead of the endogenous substrate malate Links to an external site. .    The authors said that they had to use this approach because "stable ternary complexes suitable for crystallographic analysis are hard to devise" and that either one or both of the substrates would need to be an analog.   This enzyme typically oxidizes a 4-carbon skeleton (malate), and they looked for suitable analogs. They noted that "alpha-ketomalonate is chemically stable, binds with reasonable affinity (Km = 1.0 mM) and is efficiently reduced... (kcat = 300 s -1)."   What would 'poor' Km and kcat values have looked like in a 'highly disappointing' candidate? Think back to previous lab coverage on this topic (3A, 4A). What were they looking for when making these comparisons? Which direction is 'impressive' for each of these two enzyme descriptors?   To avoid a disappointing result they wanted to make sure that the alpha-ketomalonate Km was fairly ______ and the kcat was fairly ______ in order to reasonably mimic a natural substrate like malate.  

What would be the result of an enzyme having a greater binding energy for the substrate than for the transition state?

Indicate below the interpretation for the graph above

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!