Which of the following is FALSE about the relationship between nature and health?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks: 'Which of the following is FALSE about the relationship between nature and health?' Unfortunately, the provided data does not include the list of answer options, so we cannot evaluate each option to identify which one is false.

What we do have is the listed answer: "D. Individuals reporting greater nature relatedness report lower rates of neurodegenerative disease." If we take this statement at face value, here are the considerations that typically arise in this area of health research:
- Observational associations: It is common in the literature to find associations between greater nature exposure or nature relatedness and favorable health outcomes, such as reduced stress, better mood, and some cardiovascular metrics. However, association does not imply causation, so claiming a causal link to lower neurodegenerative disease rates would require longitudinal, controlled evidence.
- Neurodegenerative diseases: These conditions (e.g., Alzheimer's, Parkinson's) have complex etiologies involving genetics, aging, lifestyle, vascular factors, and biology. While healthy environments and behaviors can contribute to overall brain health, asserting a direct reduction in neurodegenerative disease incidence purely from nature relatedness overstates current evidence.
- Potential confounders: People with higher nature relatedness might also engage in other healthy behaviors (physical activity, social engagement, higher SES, better access to preventive care) that could confound observed relationships with brain health outcomes.
- Mechanisms: If a true protective effect existed, plausible mechanisms would include reduced chronic inflammation, lower stress hormone levels, improved sleep, and greater physical activity—yet establishing a specific effect on neurodegenerative disease incidence would require rigorous research.

Given that we cannot assess options A, B, and C (which are missing), we cannot definitively declare which is false. If we consider the single D statement in isolation, it represents a strong causal claim about disease incidence that is not yet firmly established in the literature, making it a plausible candidate for being false, but this conclusion would still depend on the actual wording and content of the other options.

In summary, due to the absence of the full set of answer options, a precise determination of which statement is false cannot be made here. If you provide the complete list of choices, I can walk through each option, explain why it is true or false, and clearly identify the correct (false) statement with justifications.

PSC 150V 001 WQ 2025 Exam 3 (Final)

Which of the following is FALSE about the relationship between nature and health?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which medical conditions can be linked to decreases in environmental quality? (select all that apply)

What does the term 'planetary health' primarily refer to?

Question at position 39 Household air pollution is a major risk factor for:Household air pollution is a major risk factor for:Childhood illness from cold-related viral infectionsChildhood deaths from prematurityChildhood deaths from measlesChildhood deaths from pneumonia

Which of the following was covered as an environmental public health hazard category in this course? (Select all that apply)

At UW and in this class, DEOHS refers to ____

What is the primary focus of environmental health within the public health system?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler