Question at position 4 A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.TrueFalse

Question

Question at position 4 A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.TrueFalse

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a binary choice about anthropocentric ethics and legal rights for trees, asking you to evaluate True or False.
Option 1: True. Interpreting this option, one would claim that an anthropocentric viewpoint strongly favors attributing legal rights to trees. However, anthropocentric ethics center moral consideration on human interests and benefits. While some arguments may suggest extending concern to nonhuman entities, the default anthropocentric stance typically does not advocate for legal rights for trees as a primary goal, since legal rights are usually justified by benefiting humans or reflecting human-centered values. Therefore, labeling trees as legal rights-bearing entities would be inconsistent with a strictly human-centered framework.
Option 2: False. This option states that an anthropocentric viewpoint would not strongly favor giving legal rights to trees, which aligns with the conventional understanding of anthropocentrism. In anthropocentrism, moral and legal priority is given to human beings, and nonhuman entities are often evaluated in terms of their usefulness or impact on humans, not by intrinsic rights of their own. Hence, this stance coherently reflects the core idea of anthropocentric ethics.
Option 1’s claim, if taken literally, conflicts with the central premise of anthropocentrism, making it a faulty interpretation. Option 2’s claim coheres with the idea that legal rights for trees are not a fundamental concern under anthropocentric thinking, which tends to prioritize human welfare, responsibilities, and interests. The contrast helps illustrate why the statement about attributing legal rights to trees would be seen as inconsistent with anthropocentric reasoning, while the alternative aligns with it.

Question at position 4 A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.A person with an anthropocentric viewpoint would strongly favor attributing legal rights to trees.TrueFalse

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Biocentrism holds that every living creature has ______.

Biocentrism holds that every living creature has ______.

_____________________ philosophy initially encompasses various types of inquiry, including applied ethics oriented to issues such as nuclear power and the deployment of toxic chemicals.

_____________________ philosophy initially encompasses various types of inquiry, including applied ethics oriented to issues such as nuclear power and the deployment of toxic chemicals.

What does Leopold mean by “The Ethical Sequence”?

In context, what does the term “ethic” mean in Leopold’s argument?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler