Thomas argues that the solution to environmental problems is complete non-intervention by humans.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the prompt to set the scene: the statement to evaluate is 'Thomas argues that the solution to environmental problems is complete non-intervention by humans.' Then we consider the two answer choices provided.
Option 1: True. This would claim that Thomas believes solving environmental problems requires no human intervention at all. An important flaw here is that many environmental frameworks emphasize that some level of human input, governance, and management is necessary to address issues like pollution, habitat loss, and climate change. The blanket claim of complete non-intervention ignores the role of policy, technology, and adaptive management, making this option unlikely to be correct.
Option 2: False. This states that the claim of complete non-intervention is not what Thomas argues. Given the common interpretation that environmental challenges typically require some human action (even if debated, most scholars recognize that intervention or regulation is involved to some degree), this option seems to align with the idea that the position as described is overly absolute and thus inaccurate. The reasoning here is that environmental problems usually involve trade-offs and interventions—such as conservation, remediation, or regulation—rather than a stance of total hands-off policy.
In evaluating the two possibilities, the 'True' option hinges on a premise (total non-intervention) that substantially limits the spectrum of actions humans might take, which is generally not supported by nuanced environmental discourse. The 'False' option allows for acknowledging that Thomas’s view, if any, is likely more complex or at least not wholly uncompromising in favor of no intervention. This leads to interpreting the statement as an inaccurate representation of a balanced or realistic environmental stance, rather than a complete endorsement of non-intervention.

2(A) - English 11 Mon 3/3: Lewis Thomas Quiz

Thomas argues that the solution to environmental problems is complete non-intervention by humans.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

_____________________ 哲学最初涵盖各种类型的研究，包括针对核能和有毒化学品部署等问题的应用伦理学。

The moral reprehensibility of harmful emissions depends on

What is the premise of Aldo Leopold's "Land Ethic?"

According to the reading, which thinker fully fits with a non-anthropocentric view?

What ethical dilemma does McKibben present?

According to Thomas, what role should humans ideally take in nature?

In The Land Ethic, Leopold criticizes conservation education because:

What does Leopold argue is missing from current environmental policies?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler

2(A) - English 11 Mon 3/3: Lewis Thomas Quiz

Thomas argues that the solution to environmental problems is complete non-intervention by humans.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

_____________________ 哲学最初涵盖各种类型的研究，包括针对核能和有毒化学品部署等问题的应用伦理学。

The moral reprehensibility of harmful emissions depends on

What is the premise of Aldo Leopold's "Land Ethic?"

According to the reading, which thinker fully fits with a non-anthropocentric view?

What **ethical dilemma** does McKibben present?

According to Thomas, what role should humans ideally take in nature?

In *The Land Ethic*, Leopold criticizes conservation education because:

What does Leopold argue is missing from current environmental policies?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Making Your Study Simpler

What ethical dilemma does McKibben present?

In The Land Ethic, Leopold criticizes conservation education because: