According to David Sobel, which of the following is NOT an appropriate strategy for teaching environmental education?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

According to David Sobel, the aim of environmental education should be to cultivate ongoing relationships with local environments through experiential, place-based learning, empathy, and actionable involvement. With that framework in mind, let’s evaluate each option.
Option 1: 'Cultivate students’ sense of empathy with local nature in an early age.' This aligns with Sobel’s emphasis on developing affective connections to place and fostering care for the environment from a young age, so this is a supported strategy.
Option 2: 'Encourage students to get outside and explore nature more.' Outdoor exploration is central to place-based and experiential education, helping students form meaningful connections with their surroundings, so this is consistent with Sobel’s approach.
Option 3: 'Get students informed about environmental tragedies as early as possible.' While awareness of environmental issues is important, Sobel cautions against overwhelming students with disaster-focused information early on, as it can lead to fear or apathy rather than constructive engagement. The emphasis should be on positive, relevant, place-based experiences and empowerment, not sensationalist tragedy messaging.
Option 4: 'Offer tangible actions for students to get involved in dealing with local environmental issues.' Providing actionable involvement aligns with Sobel’s goal of translating learning into community-facing action and stewardship, making this a recommended strategy.
In summary, the reasoning behind the non-preferred option centers on timing and framing: introducing environmental tragedies too early can skew motivation and reduce agency, whereas the other options build empathy, direct experience, and practical action that Sobel advocates for in environmental education. The flawed choice is the one that highlights early tragedy information over constructive, place-based engagement.

ENVIR 100 (Sp25) Exam 3

According to David Sobel, which of the following is NOT an appropriate strategy for teaching environmental education?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Who is the influential person who defined environmental education as "producing a citizenry that is knowledgeable concerning the biospherical environment and its associated problems, aware of how to help solve these problems, and motivated to work towards their solution"?

Identify the bond angle and molecular shape of H2O.

Using Dalton's Atomic theory, explain the following observation. Hint: DO NOT answer with a law! The mass of the products at the end of the reaction was the same as the mass of the reactants at the beginning.

The number of valence electrons in a sulfur atom is 16.

If matter is uniform throughout and can be separated into multiple substances by physical means, it is called a(n) ________________.

Circle the letter for all examples of chemical change. Circle all correct answers.

Which of the following Lewis structures are incorrect? There may be more than one.

For 18O2-, identify each of the followingMass Number

More Practical Tools for International Students

Exam Browser Assistant

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler