Which of the following represents the fastest, cheapest available option for immediate reduction in carbon emissions from the electricity sector?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks which option represents the fastest, cheapest available approach for immediate reduction in carbon emissions from the electricity sector.

First, note a practical limitation: the provided data does not include the list of answer options, so I cannot compare each alternative directly. Nevertheless, we can reason about the general principles behind rapid, cost-effective emission reductions in electricity.

Idea 1: Immediate demand-side options tend to yield faster results and lower costs. Measures that reduce energy use or shift demand (such as efficiency improvements, appliance standards, building retrofits, and behavior-focused initiatives) reduce the amount of electricity that must be generated. This often translates into immediate carbon reductions because you avoid emissions from any generation in the first place.

Idea 2: Compared with supply-side strategies, efficiency improvements typically require lower capital outlay per unit of emissions avoided, especially when considering programs that leverage existing infrastructure and technologies. They avoid ongoing fuel costs and price volatility, making them economically attractive in the short term.

Idea 3: While other strategies like switching fuels, deploying renewables, or implementing carbon capture and storage can contribute to reductions, they often involve higher capital costs, longer lead times, permitting hurdles, or performance and integration challenges that slow their immediate impact. In many regions, ramping up efficiency programs can outpace these options in both speed and cost per unit of emissions reduced.

Bringing it back to the question: in typical policy and industry analyses, the fastest, cheapest available option for immediate carbon reductions from the electricity sector is a demand-side efficiency approach. This category includes improvements in energy efficiency and other measures that lower electricity consumption without requiring large-scale new generation capacity.

If the provided answer list included a choice corresponding to that efficiency-focused option, that would align with the principle described above. Other common options—such as fuel switching to lower-emission fuels, deploying more renewables, or injecting carbon capture—often involve higher upfront costs, longer gestation, or greater logistical constraints, making them less immediate and sometimes more expensive on a first-year or near-term basis.

Summary of likely reasoning progression: recognizing the immediacy and low cost of reducing demand through efficiency leads to rapid emissions reductions; contrast with supply-side methods that, while valuable, typically incur larger initial investments or longer development timelines; and apply this analysis to identify the efficiency option as the most favorable for immediate impact when options are compared.

Note: Without the explicit list of answer options, this explanation centers on the general rationale that energy efficiency (demand-side measures) commonly delivers the fastest, cheapest near-term reductions in electricity-sector carbon emissions.

Dashboard Quiz 3 - weeks 8, 9 and 10 (available during week 10)

Which of the following represents the fastest, cheapest available option for immediate reduction in carbon emissions from the electricity sector?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Meeting the rising global demand for energy supply, while slowing the rate of GHG emissions requires?

The best way to extend the usable life of fossil fuel reserves is to improve _____.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler