Which of the following is NOT legally required under BC's Pay Transparency Act?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which of the following is NOT legally required under BC's Pay Transparency Act?

Option A: All employers in BC must post the pay range in job postings
- Reasoning: The BC Pay Transparency Act requires disclosure of pay ranges in job postings for certain employers, particularly larger ones. Depending on the jurisdictional specifics, this is often tied to the size of the employer, and not necessarily a blanket requirement for every single business. If a reader assumes it applies to all employers, they would be overgeneralizing. Therefore, this option reflects a standard obligation associated with the Act for many employers, though the exact applicability can vary by size and regulation updates.

Option B: Employers cannot ask a job candidate about their pay history
- Reasoning: A key provision in such pay transparency regimes is to protect candidates from having their past earnings used to set future pay. This option captures a direct prohibition commonly found in pay transparency frameworks, making it a valid requirement under the Act.

Option C: Employers cannot punish employees who reveal their pay to others
- Reasoning: Anti-retaliation provisions are typical in pay transparency laws, ensuring employees can discuss wages without facing discipline. This option aligns with the intent of promoting wage transparency and is a correct requirement.

Option D: Most employers must post pay transparency reports
- Reasoning: Pay transparency reporting is generally targeted at larger employers and certain sectors, not necessarily a universal mandate for all “most” employers. The phrasing suggests a broad obligation that may not apply to every employer, depending on threshold criteria in the Act. This creates ambiguity about universal applicability, making it a questionable fit for a broad mandate.

Option E: Employers must pay men and women equally for the same jobs.
- Reasoning: While equal pay for equal work is a fundamental principle echoed in anti-discrimination and labor laws, the Pay Transparency Act itself emphasizes posting ranges, prohibiting pay-history inquiries, protecting disclosures, and reporting obligations. The explicit statement that employers must pay men and women equally for the same jobs reflects a broader equality principle rather than a specific, standalone requirement unique to the Pay Transparency Act. In other words, this could be governed by other laws (e.g., human rights or anti-discrimination statutes) rather than being a distinct requirement of the Pay Transparency Act.

In summary, the option that most clearly constitutes a principle not uniquely mandated by BC's Pay Transparency Act (and thus is NOT a specific legal requirement under this Act) is option E: "Employers must pay men and women equally for the same jobs." The other options describe measures that are typically associated with pay transparency regulations such as posting pay ranges, prohibiting pay-history inquiries, protecting disclosures, and reporting obligations, which are the focal points of the Act.

COMM_V 203 101 102 2025W1 2025W1 COMM 203 101-105 Final Exam - Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Which of the following is NOT legally required under BC's Pay Transparency Act?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 8 According to Lecture 6.2, understanding legal boundaries of speech in workplace contexts is one of the lecture’s learning outcomes.TrueFalse

Employment-at-will is a legal doctrine that means employees are hired and retain their jobs at the sole discretion of the employer.

Reasonable notice legislation has requirements for employers who are terminating employees via a layoff.

Particularly unfair, untruthful, misleading, insensitive, harsh, or vindictive treatment of employees in the dismissal process can leave an employer liable for bad-faith and/or punitive damages.

Due to the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers may try to have employees classified as nonexempt to avoid paying overtime.

Aida is fired from her job as a waitress when she became pregnant. Based on this scenario, identify which type of law governs this dispute.

Which of the following is NOT one of the six areas of employment law discussed in the lecture?

Question at position 39 Which of the following would NOT be considered a law enacted to protect the rights of workers?The Social Security lawThe Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)The Civil Rights ActThe Uniform Commercial Code

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler