Kramer et al.’s (2014) study on Facebook users found that non-verbal cues are necessary for emotional contagion.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a statement about Kramer et al.’s (2014) study on Facebook users: 'non-verbal cues are necessary for emotional contagion.'
Option 1: 'True' — This is not consistent with the findings. Kramer and colleagues conducted a large-scale Twitter-like manipulation where they altered the emotional content of news feeds to see if users' own emotional states shifted in the direction of what they were exposed to. The study focused on textual content and the emotional valence of status updates, not on non-verbal cues like facial expressions or gestures. Therefore, claiming that non-verbal cues are necessary overstates what the study demonstrated and ignores the mechanism of mood contagion through exposure to emotional content in text.
Option 2: 'False' — This aligns with the study’s design and interpretation. The researchers showed emotional contagion via emotional content in language within feeds, without relying on or requiring visible non-verbal signals. The lack of non-verbal cues in online text communications means contagion can occur through linguistic cues and platform algorithms rather than through cues such as facial expressions or tone of voice. Thus, the claim that non-verbal cues are necessary is not supported by their findings, making this option the accurate interpretation.
Further nuance: while the study demonstrates mood contagion from others’ expressed emotions in a digital environment, it does not claim that non-verbal cues are absent in all forms of contagion research, only that in this specific online feed manipulation, non-verbal cues were not the mechanism observed. This helps clarify the distinction between offline interpersonal communication (where non-verbal signals play a strong role) and online environments (where textual/emotional content can drive contagion).

HMAW1905D (T01) Quiz for Module 6 Unit #1

Kramer et al.’s (2014) study on Facebook users found that non-verbal cues are necessary for emotional contagion.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Studies show that college students who have depressed roommates tend to become

When we mimic, feel or catch the emotions or feelings of someone else, we are experiencing:

Sally saw how happy her friend, Paula, was in a travel photo. Paula wrote alongside the photo ‘I am so happy that I finally get to travel!’. According to the Emotional Contagion theory, Sally will likely use negative emotional words in her next Facebook status update.

Bill is in a bad mood. When he gets to work, he sits down at his desk in a huff. He doesn’t say hello to his colleagues and when one of them asks him a question, Bill snaps. Everyone is in a bad mood as a result of Bill’s bad mood. What phenomenon does this capture?

Which of the following is an example of emotional contagion?

Which of the following represents the extent to which an emotional display by one person influences the emotional state of a bystander?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler