A young manager achieved a significant organizational goal but he spent too much time and money doing so. This manager was:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this question, we’re given a scenario about a young manager who achieved a significant organizational goal but spent too much time and money in doing so. The task is to evaluate whether the manager was efficient, effective, both, or neither.

Option a: 'efficient, but not effective' would mean the manager did things in a way that used resources well, with minimal waste, but did not achieve the intended goal. The stem states that a significant organizational goal was achieved, so this option would be false because it claims there was no achievement of the goal. The scenario contradicts this, since the goal was reached.

Option b: 'effective, but not efficient' asserts that the manager did achieve the goal (effectiveness) but did so at a high cost of time and money (inefficiency). The stem confirms the goal was achieved but notes excessive time and money were spent, which aligns with being effective (got the goal) while not being efficient (resources/time were wasted). This option fits the described situation.

Option c: 'neither efficient nor effective' would imply that no goal was reached and resources were wasted. Since the goal was achieved according to the stem, this option is incorrect because it ignores the success aspect (effectiveness).

Option d: 'both efficient and effective' would require that the goal was achieved and that it was done with optimal use of time and money. The stem indicates the opposite on efficiency (spending too much time and money), so this option is inconsistent with the scenario.

To recap the logic in a different light: if success (goal achievement) is present but resource use (time and money) is excessive, the performance is considered effective but inefficient. The question is testing this duality—success without resource optimization—so Option b accurately captures that nuance.

A young manager achieved a significant organizational goal but he spent too much time and money doing so. This manager was:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When analyzing the interrelationships between efficiency and effectiveness, where would a company ideally want to operate?

When considering the interrelationships between efficiency and effectiveness where does a company ideally want to operate?

There are two paths to increased profit. A firm can either attempt to increase revenue, which would be an increase in [ Select ] effectiveness logistics marketing efficiency or it could attempt to decrease costs, which is an increase in [ Select ] logistics efficiency effectiveness marketing .

A young manager achieved a significant organizational goal but he spent too much time and money doing so. This manager was:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler