How does François Quesnay’s "Tableau Économique" fundamentally differ from Adam Smith’s circular flow model?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, we restate the question and all options to ensure clarity about what’s being compared.
Question: How does François Quesnay’s "Tableau Économique" fundamentally differ from Adam Smith’s circular flow model?
Answer options:
1) It incorporates the influence of government taxation more explicitly.
2) It excludes the role of industry and focuses exclusively on agriculture.
3) It models wealth distribution rather than wealth creation.
4) It assumes equilibrium rather than market competition as the driving force.

Now, let’s evaluate each option in turn:
Option 1: It incorporates the influence of government taxation more explicitly.
- Analysis: This statement is not characteristic of the Tableau Économique. Quesnay’s model is primarily concerned with the flows of value between classes (rentiers, productive landowners, and workers) and the agricultural surplus, rather than a formal treatment of government taxation. Smith’s framework touches on taxes and government in a broader sense, but neither model is defined by explicit, systematic taxation mechanics within the classic Tableau itself. Therefore this option misattributes a hallmark of Quesnay relative to Smith.

Option 2: It excludes the role of industry and focuses exclusively on agriculture.
- Analysis: This is the core distinguishing feature. Quesnay posited that agriculture is the sole source of "net product" and wealth creation, with industry playing a secondary or derivative role. The Tableau emphasizes land agriculture as the source of surplus and uses it to explain the circulation of wealth, whereas Smith’s circular flow envisions a broader economy where production, trade, and distribution occur across multiple sectors, including industry. Thus, this option accurately captures a fundamental difference.

Option 3: It models wealth distribution rather than wealth creation.
- Analysis: While the Tableau does show how wealth generated by agriculture is distributed among classes and how surplus moves, the primary focus is still on wealth creation through agricultural surplus and its circulation as opposed to a static distribution model. Smith’s model similarly concerns value creation through production and exchange. Saying the Tableau models wealth distribution in isolation overstates the emphasis and can be misleading about the intended purpose of the Tableau, which is to explain the generation of surplus via agriculture and its circulation through economic classes.

Option 4: It assumes equilibrium rather than market competition as the driving force.
- Analysis: Quesnay’s Tableau is often read as illustrating an equilibrium-like flow of agricultural surplus through the economy, but characterizing it as an assumption of equilibrium over market competition is not its defining feature. Smith’s framework emphasizes the dynamics of markets, competition, and the invisible hand. While both models involve some notion of balance, this option does not capture the key, distinctive idea of Quesnay focusing on agricultural surplus as the source of wealth, making it the least precise descriptor among the choices.

In summary, each option presents a claim about differences between the two models, but the most consistent distinction with historical interpretation is that Quesnay’s Tableau Économique centers on agriculture as the primary source of wealth and largely omits industry from its core analysis, whereas Smith’s circular flow presents a broader, industry-inclusive view of economic activity.

History of Economic and Social Thoughts G2 (2025P564001101M1500) Mock Individual Activity- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

How does François Quesnay’s "Tableau Économique" fundamentally differ from Adam Smith’s circular flow model?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following best differentiates an economic theory from an economic model?

30. What is the main purpose of the lecture?

30. What is the main purpose of the lecture?

30. What is the main purpose of the lecture?

What is the primary purpose of economic models?

What is the primary purpose of economic models?

Economic models_____.

Which of the following is not correct about most economic models?

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler