Question at position 41 Why is it important to consider multiple drivers rather than a single explanation when evaluating bee decline evidence?Because multiple drivers often act independently and do not influence one another.Because ecological responses to stressors are complex and involve interacting pressures.Because multiple drivers complicate research and therefore should generally be ignored.Because singular drivers always provide complete explanations for population collapses.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze why considering multiple drivers matters in bee decline evidence, we evaluate each statement on its own terms.
Option 1: 'Because multiple drivers often act independently and do not influence one another.' This claim is misleading because, in ecological systems, drivers often interact and influence each other. For example, pesticide exposure can interact with habitat loss or disease, altering combined effects rather than acting in isolation. Therefore this option undervalues potential interactions between stressors.
Option 2: 'Because ecological responses to stressors are complex and involve interacting pressures.' This statement accurately reflects ecological complexity: bee declines typically result from a suite of interacting factors (pesticides, parasites like Varroa, pathogens, nutrition, climate, habitat, etc.). Recognizing interactions helps avoid attributing decline to a single cause when the reality is multi-causal and potentially synergistic.
Option 3: 'Because multiple drivers complicate research and therefore should generally be ignored.' This is a pessimistic stance that defeats scientific progress. While complexity makes research harder, it does not justify ignoring multiple drivers; rather, it motivates comprehensive study designs and analyses to untangle their effects.
Option 4: 'Because singular drivers always provide complete explanations for population collapses.' This is an overstated and false claim. In most natural systems, single drivers fail to capture the full story, since population collapses usually emerge from interacting factors rather than a single cause.
In summary, the only option that aligns with ecological understanding of bee declines—emphasizing the complexity and interplay of multiple stressors—is option 2, while the others either misrepresent interactions, advocate ignoring complexity, or assume single-cause sufficiency.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Identify the correct statement related to concepts and ideas in ecology:

True or False: Ecological research can be used to support environmental activism.

____________ is a branch of science that studies habitat and the interactions between the biotic and abiotic components.

____________ is a branch of science that studies habitat and the interactions between the biotic and abiotic components.

Match each term to its definition. 1: abiotic factors 2: biotic factors 3: ecosystem 4: ecosystem ecology

Which of the following is the BEST definition of ecology:

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler