Questions
COMP2017 COMP9017 (ND) inclass5w6P1
Single choice
Select the true statement
View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The prompt provided has no list of answer options to compare, so I’ll first note that the true assessment depends on the available choices. With the information shown, there is a statement: "We can call malloc and free in any function, as long as we eventually call free on that particular block of memory." Here’s how to reason about this concept in C:
- Core idea: malloc allocates a block of memory on the heap and returns a pointer. free releases that same block back to the heap. The critical constraint is ownership: each allocated block must be freed exactly once by som......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
Consider the function call: p = (data_t *)malloc((num - 1) * sizeof(data_t)) The intention of this function call is best described as:
Inside the main() function of "particletest.c", we have now allocated an array of 1024 particles of type Particle. As we would like this number to be flexible in the future, the array is allocated dynamically using malloc(), which is part of the C Standard General Utilities Library. 在"particletest.c"的 main()函数中,我们动态分配了一个包含 1024 个 Particle 类型粒子的数组。为了使这个数字在未来可以灵活调整,我们使用 C 标准通用工具库中的 malloc()函数来动态分配数组。 Our implementation uses the following approach: 我们的实现采用了以下方法: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define NUM_PARTICLES 1024 ··· int main() { Particle *particles = (Particle *)malloc(NUM_PARTICLES); ··· } Despite the fact that the declaration seems correct, the code produces a segmentation fault exception in some experiments. However, in some other situations, no apparent errors are produced. Do you consider the declaration and allocation to be correct (and, thus, the error located somewhere else in the source code)?
Inside the main() function of "particletest.c", we have now allocated an array of 1024 particles of type Particle. As we would like this number to be flexible in the future, the array is allocated dynamically using malloc(), which is part of the C Standard General Utilities Library. Our implementation uses the following approach: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define NUM_PARTICLES 1024 ··· int main() { Particle *particles = (Particle *)malloc(NUM_PARTICLES); ··· } Despite the fact that the declaration seems correct, the code produces a segmentation fault exception in some experiments. However, in some other situations, no apparent errors are produced. Do you consider the declaration and allocation to be correct (and, thus, the error located somewhere else in the source code)?
Which header file must be included to use dynamic memory allocation functions like malloc and free?
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!