Questions
hk_302_120251_246592 3.3 | Learning Check
Single choice
The ruling from Olmstead v. L.C. court case stipulated that:
Options
A.Children with disabilities should receive free and appropriate public education.
B.It is considered discrimination to segregate people with disabilities into nursing homes or other institutional settings against their will.
C.Courtrooms need to be made accessible for individuals with disabilities.
D.Children with disabilities are required to have appropriate assistive technology to support their educational endeavors.
View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The question asks about the ruling from the Olmstead v. L.C. court case and what it stipulated.
Option A: 'Children with disabilities should receive free and appropriate public education.' This statement aligns with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) principles, not Olmstead. It describes e......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
True or false: After implementation, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was strongly enforced and resulted in significant changes in the day to day lives of individuals with disabilities.
In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things
Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products
People born without creativity never can develop it
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!