One problem with Cultural Relativism is that it does not allow for the possibility for a culture to make moral progress.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement present in the question is: 'One problem with Cultural Relativism is that it does not allow for the possibility for a culture to make moral progress.'

To evaluate this, first consider what Cultural Relativism (CR) claims: moral norms and judgments are determined by the standards of each culture, and there is no objective, universal morality that overrides these cultural norms.

Option analysis:
- True: This assertion points to a standard critique of CR. If morality is entirely determined by cultural norms, then there is no accessible outer benchmark to judge a culture as morally better or worse. Consequently, reform or progress within a culture would be reframed as mere internal change rather than universal progress, making genuine moral improvement across cultures hard to evaluate or endorse from a neutral standpoint. This is the core worry: CR can seem to block the idea that some practices may be morally wrong even if they are culturally endorsed, because there is no external standard to appeal to for moral advancement.

- False: If one argued that CR does permit moral progress, they would need to claim that progress is defined entirely within a culture’s own standards. This could allow a culture to improve by its own lights (e.g., abolishing a practice, expanding rights) without appealing to universal norms. However, this is often seen as a weakened or contested reading of CR, and many philosophers regard the standard CR position as making cross-cultural progress assessment and external condemnation difficult. The common critique centers on the tension between recognizing internal reform and acknowledging morally abhorrent practices when there is no universal yardstick.

In summary, the statement highlights a widely discussed limitation: CR’s framework can seem to preclude objective judgments of moral progress across cultures, since it relies on cultural norms as the sole standard. This is the essence of the identified problem and is why many ethics texts categorize this as a flaw of Cultural Relativism.

PHIL 220-001 Quiz: Rachels "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism"

One problem with Cultural Relativism is that it does not allow for the possibility for a culture to make moral progress.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Lesson 6: In the Ted Talk by Sam Harris on Science and Morality, he argues for cultural relativism and that we should not judge other cultures, even if their morals do not agree with ours.

According to Wong, moral universalism must be true because there is always widespread agreement within a particular culture about morality.

According to Wong, one feature of moral ambivalence is that when you encounter a culture with norms different than your own, you take their view seriously enough that you try to understand why they believe as they do.

The Cultural Differences Argument is an argument intended to support Cultural Relativism.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler