Question at position 43 It avoids any analysis of moral or ethical issuesIt encourages people to follow traditions without questioning themIt prevents people from exploring new perspectivesIt teaches people to think critically before making choicesIt focuses only on abstract ideas with no practical use

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents five statements about what philosophy offers in everyday decision-making, and asks you to evaluate each option.
Option 1: 'It avoids any analysis of moral or ethical issues' — This is misleading. Philosophy often engages with ethics, values, and moral reasoning, helping people analyze what is right or wrong in various scenarios. Saying it avoids moral analysis contradicts the core aims of many philosophical inquiries.
Option 2: 'It encourages people to follow traditions without questioning them' — Philosophy typically promotes examination and critical evaluation rather than blind conformity. By teaching how to question assumptions, it often leads to revisiting and revising traditions rather than unquestioning adherence.
Option 3: 'It prevents people from exploring new perspectives' — On the contrary, philosophy invites exploring diverse viewpoints, challenging established ideas, and considering alternatives. The claim that it prevents exploration runs opposite to the exploratory nature of philosophical inquiry.
Option 4: 'It teaches people to think critically before making choices' — This aligns with the core value of philosophy: developing critical thinking, reflective reasoning, and careful analysis before acting. It emphasizes evaluating arguments, evidence, and consequences, leading to more informed decisions.
Option 5: 'It focuses only on abstract ideas with no practical use' — While philosophy does engage with abstract concepts, its methods—clarifying concepts, detecting logical fallacies, and constructing reasoned arguments—have clear practical applications in everyday decision-making, problem-solving, and communication. The claim that it has no practical use is therefore inaccurate.
In summary, each of the first three options mischaracterizes philosophy by denying its ethical engagement, promoting uncritical tradition, or discouraging perspective-taking. The fourth option accurately reflects philosophy’s practical contribution to everyday decision-making by fostering critical thinking. The fifth option underestimates philosophy’s practical impact by dismissing its relevance to real decisions.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Explain one of the most important or useful things you have learned through this class so far. In two paragraphs or fewer, make us believe that you are knowledgeable about this more than a person who is not taking this class, and that it is important.

What are the purposes of logic in our everyday life? Select MORE THAN ONE answers.

Complementing _______ with Systems Thinking will help us expand our understanding about the world we live in.

Please read the instructions and passage in the pdf document linked below before answering the question - L08 Quiz Question 6 instructions.pdf Which three elements of the Baloney Detection Toolkit do you think the article most egregiously flout? (3 answers)

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler