An analyst assesses a company as below average on ESG metrics. All other matters being equal, the analyst is most likely to:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: An analyst assesses a company as below average on ESG metrics. All other matters being equal, the analyst is most likely to:

Option analysis (note: the list of answer options is not provided in the prompt, but the provided correct answer is that the analyst would increase the company's cost of capital):

- Correct option (as given): increase the company's cost of capital. 
  Why this is correct: When ESG performance is below average, investors may perceive higher risk related to governance, environmental liabilities, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. This perceived higher risk typically translates into a higher required return on equity and a higher return demanded by lenders, which raises the company’s overall cost of capital. In practical terms, lenders and investors demand a premium to compensate for ESG-related risks, leading to higher discount rates, interest rates, and weighted average cost of capital (WACC).

- Rationale if there were other plausible options (hypothetical exploration): If there were a choice suggesting no change in cost of capital, that would be inconsistent with established finance and ESG risk literature, which links poor ESG performance to higher risk premia. If there were a choice suggesting a decrease in cost of capital, that would contradict the risk-elevation narrative associated with below-average ESG metrics. If a choice claimed ESG has no relation to capital costs, it would ignore the market's incorporation of ESG risk into discount rates and funding costs.

- Practical implications for analysts and stakeholders: Recognize that ESG underperformance can affect financing terms, investor demand, and strategic incentives. Companies with weak ESG scores may face higher borrowing costs, tighter covenants, or more scrutiny from lenders and rating agencies. Conversely, improving ESG metrics can help reduce perceived risk and potentially lower the cost of capital over time.

Note: The provided data lacks the complete list of answer options. The assessment above explains why the stated correct answer aligns with typical financial reasoning about ESG risk and cost of capital.

FINA3401.13791.202610 Practice Ch. 7 Quiz

An analyst assesses a company as below average on ESG metrics. All other matters being equal, the analyst is most likely to:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

An analyst assesses a company as below average on ESG metrics. All other matters being equal, the analyst is most likely to:

When determining a firm's cost of capital, the most important determinant is the:

When calculating WACC, we only need to calculate the after-tax cost of debt, not the cost of equity. Why ?

A business has its WACC of 10%, what does this number mean to a business ?

Generally, which of the following costs is lower ?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler