Questions
GBSH0024_25-26 Quiz for week 5
Multiple choice
An economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial can produce misleading cost-effectiveness estimate of the intervention if:
Options
A.a. There is only one relevant trial
B.b. The trial does not include the appropriate comparator
C.c. Health related quality of life was the primary outcome in the trial
D.d. Trial population differs from the typical population to receive intervention (e.g. younger and/or healthier)
E.e. The trial was executed in a different country

View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
When evaluating how an economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial can yield a misleading cost-effectiveness estimate, we need to consider factors that distort the applicability or relevance of the findings across target settings.
Option a: 'There is only one relevant trial' Regarding this choice, having a single relevant trial doesn’t by itself create a misleading cost-effectiveness estimate. Although reliance on a single study can introduce uncertainty and limit generalizability, the statement as a blanket condition does not necessarily imply misestimation of cost-effectiveness. The mislead......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
In reports of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, we present:
In economic evaluations alongside randomised clinical trials:
Which of the following statements about cost effectiveness analysis is true? Cost-effectiveness analysis:
In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!