Ganjaflex Industries is a major multinational conglomerate. Its business units compete in a range of industries, including home appliances, pharmaceuticals, commercial real estate, and plastics manufacturing. Although its largest business unit, which produces kitchen appliances, is among the most profitable in the industry, it generates only 35 percent of the company’s revenues. Which of the following is most likely true of Ganjaflex’s stock price?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle the question, begin by framing what the stock price represents for a diversified conglomerate like Ganjaflex: investors value the company as the sum of the present values of its distinct business units, adjusted for corporate overhead, capital structure, and the benefits or drawbacks of diversification.
Option 1: 'It is valued at the exact sum of individual business units.' This implies a perfect, no-friction aggregation where the market assigns each unit its standalone value with no diversification costs or synergies. In practice, such exact parity is rare because conglomerates incur additional costs and complexities (e.g., management inefficiencies, opaque capital allocation) that typically prevent a perfect match. Therefore, this option is unlikely.
Option 2: 'It is valued at greater than the sum of individual business units.' A premium beyond the simple sum would require strong diversification benefits or corporate-level synergies that investors believe will unlock value above each unit’s standalone worth. While possible in exceptional cases, it is not the common outcome for large, diversified firms, where discounts are more typical than premiums.
Option 3: 'It is consistently lower than the industry average.' This compares a conglomerate’s market valuation to industry metrics rather than to the sum of its own units. While the firm’s valuation relative to peers could vary, stating a consistent underperformance versus the industry average is a broad generalization that ignores company-specific performance, growth prospects, and capital allocation. It’s not the most precise characterization in this context.
Option 4: 'It is valued at less than the sum of its individual business units.' This captures the idea of a conglomerate discount: investors may discount a diversified firm’s value because of complexity, potential misallocation of capital across units, and governance costs. The fact that the largest unit generates 35% of revenue yet profitability is high suggests diverse operations but does not eliminate diversification discounts; the market often prices the conglomerate below the straight sum of its parts.
In summary, the reasoning aligns with the well-documented concept of a conglomerate discount: investors often assign less value to a diversified firm than the aggregated value of its separate businesses, due to the added costs and inefficiencies of managing a multi-industry portfolio. The remaining options either assume an exact summation, a rare premium, or make broad industry comparisons that don’t directly address how the market values a conglomerate’s overall unit mix and corporate structure.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

The corporate valuation model can be used only when a company doesn't pay dividends.

Wing Hang Bank has EBIT of $500m and no growth. It has a cost of equity of 20%. It is currently 100% equity funded. It has an optimal capital structure of 50% debt (at 5% after-tax cost) and 50% equity (at 20% cost). What is the standalone value of Wing Hang? What is the value of control?

Regarding Corporate Valuation, select the correct alternative:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler