Regarding Corporate Valuation, select the correct alternative:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Regarding Corporate Valuation, select the correct alternative. Options are:
1) Corporate valuation is only relevant for private equity firms, as market prices are unavailable.
2) A company’s valuation excludes future growth opportunities and considers only its current cash flows.
3) Intrinsic valuation is based on comparing a company to its industry peers.
4) Enterprise Value represents the value of a company’s core assets as funded by both debt and equity investors.

Analysis of each option:
Option 1: 'Corporate valuation is only relevant for private equity firms, as market prices are unavailable.' This is inaccurate because corporate valuation is relevant to a wide range of stakeholders (public and private companies, strategic buyers, lenders, investors) and relies on market prices as well as fundamental analysis. The statement incorrectly narrows the scope of valuation and ignores broader applications, such as evaluating sale options, capital structure, and strategic investments.
Option 2: 'A company’s valuation excludes future growth opportunities and considers only its current cash flows.' This is misleading because many valuation approaches explicitly incorporate future growth (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis, growth projections) and the value of growth opportunities is a core component in most modern valuation frameworks. Focusing solely on current cash flows omits essential forward-looking elements.
Option 3: 'Intrinsic valuation is based on comparing a company to its industry peers.' Here, the description confuses intrinsic valuation with relative valuation. Intrinsic valuation typically uses fundamentals (cash flows, discount rates, growth, risk) to estimate an actual value independent of peers, whereas comparing to industry peers is characteristic of relative valuation or benchmarking, not intrinsic valuation.
Option 4: 'Enterprise Value represents the value of a company’s core assets as funded by both debt and equity investors.' This statement aligns with the standard definition of Enterprise Value (EV): it reflects the total value of the firm as funded by all capital providers, incorporating debt, equity, and excluding cash, capturing the market value of core assets funded by both debt and equity. This framing is consistent with EV’s role in representing the firm’s value irrespective of capital structure.

Putting it together, the incorrect options fail to capture key concepts of corporate valuation or mischaracterize valuation methods, while the correct option accurately describes Enterprise Value as the combined value of core assets financed by debt and equity. The reasoning highlights how each alternative aligns or misaligns with fundamental valuation principles and clarifies common conceptual confusions between intrinsic vs. relative valuation and the scope of corporate valuation practices.

COMM_V 298 201-207 2024W2 2024W2 COMM 298 Final Exam April 24, 2025 - Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Regarding Corporate Valuation, select the correct alternative:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

The corporate valuation model can be used only when a company doesn't pay dividends.

Wing Hang Bank has EBIT of $500m and no growth. It has a cost of equity of 20%. It is currently 100% equity funded. It has an optimal capital structure of 50% debt (at 5% after-tax cost) and 50% equity (at 20% cost). What is the standalone value of Wing Hang? What is the value of control?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler