The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the central idea of the prompt: whether a commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted for allowing corruption to occur and for failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption.
Option a: 'a. True' — This option asserts that both the organization and its management can be prosecuted when corruption occurs and when proper preventive measures are not in place. In many legal systems, corporate liability can attach to organizations for corrupt activities, and management can be held personally accountable for failings such as inadequate anti-corruption controls, negligent oversight, or enabling a corrupt environment. The reasoning here rests on concepts like corporate criminal liability, vicarious liability, and the duty of care that leaders owe to implement effective compliance programs. If prosecutors can show that corruption occurred and that reasonable, adequate procedures to prevent corruption were not in place or were not followed, charges against the organization and/or its leaders can be warranted.
Option b: 'b. False' — This option would claim that neither the organization nor its management can be prosecuted in such a scenario. This is typically incorrect because, in many jurisdictions, there is clear legal backing for prosecuting corporate entities and their executives for failure to prevent corruption. The false claim would ignore established principles of corporate accountability, due diligence obligations, and the potential for personal liability for managers who neglect to implement or enforce anti-corruption controls. It also neglects the idea that systemic failures within governance and control environments can be prosecutable offenses, not just isolated acts by individual employees.
Additional nuance to consider: the precise standards for liability—such as what constitutes 'adequate procedures' or the required level of managerial oversight—vary by country and regulatory framework. Some regimes require proof of intent, others rely on negligence or a failure to implement reasonable measures. Nevertheless, the general principle that both an organization and its management can face prosecution for allowing corruption and for failing to establish preventive controls is widely recognized in many anti-corruption laws and compliance regimes.
In summary, option a aligns with the common legal understanding of corporate accountability, while option b conflicts with the fundamental concept that organizations and their leaders can be prosecuted for corruption and for not implementing preventive measures.

Integrity and Anti-Corruption Course (052025-MUN) Topic Quiz 8

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Anderson was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ______________

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

The commercial organization and its management can be prosecuted because of allowing corruption to happen and failing to implement adequate procedures to prevent corruption from happening.

Allan was bribing RM50 000 to company XYZ to get the contract of supplying the computers of his company. If he is found guilty, the following are the other people that will be charged too under corporate liabilities except for ____________.

A contract entered into by a corporation is enforceable:

Bill owns, operates and is the sole employee of a candy store called Bill's Candy Corporation. A batch of candy was sold past the best-before date. Who should the consumer sue as the responsible party?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler