Which of the following statements is correct about contributory negligence?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks which statement is correct about contributory negligence, given four options labeled a through d.
Option a: 'If a plaintiff has contributed to his or her loss, damage or injury, the damages awarded under negligence may be reduced proportionately to the negligent actions of that plaintiff.' This reflects the classic understanding of contributory negligence in many jurisdictions, where the plaintiff's own fault can reduce or bar recovery depending on the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff. The idea of proportional reduction aligns with the general concept of contributory negligence as a partial defense reducing damages.
Option b: 'If a plaintiff contributes 50% or more to the loss or damage they suffer, the defendant will not be liable for that loss or damage.' This describes a threshold-based rule where any 50% or greater fault on the plaintiff completely bars recovery. While some jurisdictions previously used all-or-nothing rules, many places have moved to comparative negligence frameworks that reduce damages rather than outright bar them when the plaintiff is at fault. Therefore, as a blanket statement, this is not universally correct and may be inaccurate depending on the jurisdiction.
Option c: 'Contributory negligence refers to an act of negligence committed by the defendant and must be claimed with an action for voluntary assumption of risk.' This option confuses contributory negligence with other concepts. Contributory negligence concerns the plaintiff’s own negligent contribution, not an act by the defendant, and it is separate from claims about assumption of risk or voluntary acceptance of risk. The phrasing here mixes multiple concepts and misstates the definition, making it incorrect.
Option d: 'Contributory negligence has now been abolished by the new Civil Liability legislation.' This asserts a universal abolition of contributory negligence, which is not accurate in many legal systems. While some jurisdictions have replaced contributory negligence with comparative negligence or fault-based schemes, the blanket statement that it has been abolished is incorrect and would be jurisdiction-specific at best. The wording as a universal statement is not generally true.
Further analysis: The key concept behind contributory negligence is the balancing of fault between plaintiff and defendant and how it affects damages or liability. Option a accurately captures the essence of proportionate reduction of damages due to plaintiff’s contributory fault, which is consistent with the traditional or common formulations in many jurisdictions using partial or comparative fault rules. Options b and d make absolute statements that are not universally applicable and depend on jurisdiction and legislative changes; option c incorrectly describes who is negligent and combines elements that do not belong together, leading to a false explanation of contributory negligence.
In summary, option a aligns with the standard understanding of contributory negligence in many legal frameworks, while the other options present common misconceptions or jurisdictionally specific conclusions that are not universally correct. The differences hinge on how fault is allocated, whether damages are reduced, whether a threshold bars recovery, or whether the concept is abolished entirely, and on the precise statutory regime in place.

Dashboard Assessment 2 - Online Quiz

Which of the following statements is correct about contributory negligence?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

If the defendant (‘D’) in a negligent case successfully proves the defence of contributory negligence by the plaintiff (‘P’), which is correct.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler