Which intepretation rule states that the exemption clause is intended to cover only the matters contained in the contract.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze this question, we examine what each rule generally means in contract interpretation.
Option a: 'a. Four corners rule' correctly captures the idea that the exemption clause is interpreted only in light of the contract's text and the matters expressly contained within the document. This rule confines extrinsic evidence and looks to the four corners of the document for meaning.
Option b: 'Negligence Rule' does not apply to contract interpretation of exemption clauses; negligence rules pertain to duties of care and liability, not to the bounded textual interpretation of contract provisions.
Option c: 'Ambiguity Rule' centers on how to treat ambiguous terms, often allowing extrinsic evidence or standard interpretations when language is unclear. While ambiguity can trigger broader interpretation, it does not specifically state that the exemption clause is limited strictly to the contract's contents.
Option d: 'Deviation Rule' generally concerns deviations from contractual performance or delivery standards, not the scope of interpreting an exemption clause within the contract's textual boundaries.
Overall, the Four corners approach directly addresses limiting interpretation to the contract’s contained matters, whereas the other options refer to different concepts that do not uniquely express that limitation.

MCD2070 - T3 - 2025 Express Terms and Exemption Clauses Quiz

Which intepretation rule states that the exemption clause is intended to cover only the matters contained in the contract.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

An exemption clause is construed by looking at the contract as a whole, including the exemption clause, and interpreting it according to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words. This is called the