Courts generally do not consider the economic adequacy of consideration when deciding whether to enforce a contract.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In evaluating contract formation, the key issue is whether consideration exists and is bargained-for, not whether the deal is economically fair. 
Option 1: True. Courts typically do not assess the economic adequacy of consideration; they focus on whether consideration exists and whether there is a voluntary agreement, unless there are issues like duress, fraud, or unconscionability that would require intervention. Broadly speaking, unequal or seemingly one-sided deals are not automatically invalidated simply due to poor economic value. 
Option 2: False. Claiming that courts consider economic adequacy would imply they routinely strike down or invalidate contracts because one side’s consideration is worth far less than the other’s, which is not how contract law operates in most ordinary cases. The law expects parties to negotiate and accept risk, and it generally defers to their assessment of value unless there are special circumstances such as misrepresentation, duress, or gross unconscionability that would invalidate the agreement. 
Option 3: False. If the evaluation were about only whether there is any consideration at all, that would be true, but the statement asserts a broader standard about economic adequacy, which is contrary to standard practice. The reality is that adequacy is not typically a controlling factor. 
Option 4: True. Some scholars worry that courts should consider fairness, but the prevailing doctrine remains that economic adequacy is not a prerequisite for enforceability, reinforcing the principle that the substance of the bargain matters more than its comparative value.

BUSFIN 3500 AU2025 (2111) Final Exam Au_1_25- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Courts generally do not consider the economic adequacy of consideration when deciding whether to enforce a contract.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

If Becky (an adult) promises not to drink apple juice for three years in exchange for Ben's promise of $1,100, the agreement is:

Joey owes Chandler $5,000 for past rent, acting lessons, and tap dance lessons. Joey offers Chandler a one-of-a-kind movie ticket to his next big movie premier as payment of his debt. Chandler accepts Joey's offer. Which of the following statements is/are true:

Soupy Sales makes a big sale for XYZ Corporation. Afterward the company promises Soupy a $5,000 year-end bonus. The company's promise is unenforceable.

Which one of the following is NOT good consideration for a promise to sell a car?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler