Apple’s App Store reviews every app submitted to ensure that content does not cross “over the line,” but fails to clearly define what this boundary is. This results in

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a scenario where Apple’s App Store reviews are vague about what constitutes crossing the boundary, and asks what this results in.
First, note that there are no additional answer options provided to compare against. This means we can only evaluate the single given option and discuss its plausibility within the described context.
The provided option states: a 'chilling effect' whereby developers choose to avoid any content they think might be at all objectionable. This aligns with a well-known concept in policy and law: when enforcement is uncertain or boundaries are not clearly defined, actors may self-censor to avoid risk, leading to a chilling effect. In this case, developers, fearing rejection or delays due to ambiguous standards, might preemptively withdraw or heavily filter content, even if such content could be permissible under a looser interpretation.
From a reasoning standpoint, the core idea is that vagueness in content guidelines creates risk aversion. If the boundary is unclear, the safest strategy for developers is to err on the side of caution, which manifests as avoiding content that could be considered borderline or controversial. This can dampen innovation, reduce variety in the app ecosystem, and stifle legitimate expression.
An alternative line of thought, which cannot be evaluated here due to the absence of other options, would consider whether the boundary ambiguity might also deter legitimate submissions while not necessarily producing a broad chilling effect, or whether other mechanisms (appeals, feedback, or policy clarifications) mitigate the chilling impact. Without competing choices to critique, these angles remain speculative in this specific analysis.
In summary, given the described vagueness, the chilling effect explanation is a logical consequence: developers become inclined to avoid content they fear could cross an ill-defined line, thereby reducing willingness to experiment with certain features or topics.

SOC 110-003 Quiz 3

Apple’s App Store reviews every app submitted to ensure that content does not cross “over the line,” but fails to clearly define what this boundary is. This results in

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Tom, a policymaker, is recently considering regulating the hostile content on social media by having the technology companies monitor and remove trolling content from their platforms. Which of the following might be a difficulty that Tom runs into?

Which of the following is least likely to be a problem faced by a social-media platform which allows users to “speak freely within the bounds of the law”?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler