Questions
Questions

AGRI30045_2025_SM2 Practical 1: Evaluation of automated oestrus detection technology

Multiple fill-in-the-blank

Question 1: Define the test status (TP/TN/FP/FN) of the cows in the following table. (5 marks) Cow Number Date Gold standard  (Milk progesterone) Peak activity change Threshold: Peak activity change at least one day >30 3 days blockThreshold>30 Test status 1219 4/11/2013 1 87 1 1   [Fill in the blank] 1219 5/11/2013 1 9 0 1219 6/11/2013 1 2 0 1219 16/11/2013 0 6 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1219 17/11/2013 0 4 0 1219 18/11/2013 0 4 0 1219 19/11/2013 0 35 1 1   [Fill in the blank] 1219 20/11/2013 0 4 0 1219 21/11/2013 0 -1 0 1219 22/11/2013 0 4 0 0 [Fill in the blank] 1219 23/11/2013 0 2 0 1219 24/11/2013 0 12 0 1286 10/11/2013 1 1 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1286 11/11/2013 1 -2 0 1286 12/11/2013 1 11 0 1306 4/11/2013 0 13 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1306 5/11/2013 0 23 0 1306 6/11/2013 0 7 0 1306 19/11/2013 1 38 1 1   [Fill in the blank] 1306 20/11/2013 1 4 0 1306 21/11/2013 1 0 0 1399 25/11/2013 1 6 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1399 26/11/2013 1 1 0 1399 27/11/2013 1 24 0 1431 19/11/2013 0 22 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1431 20/11/2013 0 13 0 1431 21/11/2013 0 0 0 1460 4/11/2013 1 27 0 0   [Fill in the blank] 1460 5/11/2013 1 4 0 1460 6/11/2013 1 2 0

View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
Question restatement: - We are asked to define the test status (TP/TN/FP/FN) of the cows in the given table. The table provides, for each cow/date entry, a Gold standard value from Milk progesterone, a Peak activity change value, a Threshold indicator (whether Peak activity change on at least one day > 30), a 3 days block indicator (Threshold > 30 within a 3-day block), and the Test status (to be filled as TP/TN/FP/FN). - The dataset includes multiple rows for cows identified by number 1219, 1286, 1306, 1399, 1431, 1460 with various dates. The answer field accompanying the data lists the intended labels for each row in sequence: [TP, TN, FP, TN, FN, TN, TP, FN, TN, FN]. There are no multiple-choice options provided in this question; instead, the task is to classify each row according to the standard TP/TN/FP/FN definitions. Understanding how to determine TP/TN/FP/FN from the data: - Conceptually, a True Positive (TP) would occur when the Gold standard indicates a positive condition (e.g., 1 for progesterone indicating pregnancy/pregnancy-like status) and the test also indicates a positive result (Test status = 1). - A True Negative (TN) would occur when the Gold standard indicates a negative condition (e.g., 0) and the......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

Consider the targeted marketing campaign case of selling products through promotional catalogs. The following tables show the confusion matrices of the classification tree model and the logit regression model, which classifies customers into 'likely to respond' (positive) and 'not likely to respond' (negative). Confusion Matrix of the Classification Tree Model: p (actual) n (actual) p (predicted) 10 4 n (predicted) 3 15   Confusion Matrix of the Logit Regression Model: p (actual) n (actual) p (predicted) 13 5 n (predicted) 2 12 Which model is more accurate (higher accuracy rate) based on the information given in these confusion matrices?

Which factor(s) will increase when the prediction agrees with the gold standard.

The sum true positives + false negatives equals:

A model was developed to classify whether or not tweets were written by a Twitter bot. The results from using the classification model on 24 tweets are shown below in the confusion matrix. Use the confusion matrix to answer the following questions. Give your answers as percentages rounded to one decimal place e.g. 23.1% or 42.0%. The accuracy of the classification model (PCC) was [Fill in the blank], %. [Fill in the blank], % of the tweets were predicted to be written by a bot. Of the tweets that were actually written by a bot, [Fill in the blank], % were correctly predicted to be written by bot. Of the tweets that were actually written by a bot, [Fill in the blank], % were incorrectly predicted to not be written by bot.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!