True or False: The improvements in mosquito nets are a confounding factor in this experiment.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: True or False: The improvements in mosquito nets are a confounding factor in this experiment.

First, recall what a confounding factor is: a variable that is related to both the exposure (or treatment) and the outcome, and which is not an intended part of the causal pathway. If such a factor varies between groups and could explain differences in outcomes, it confounds the interpretation of the treatment effect.

Now, consider the statement being evaluated as False. This implies that the improvements in mosquito nets do not qualify as a confounding factor under the study design.

- If the nets are a deliberate part of the experimental manipulation (i.e., the intervention being tested includes improved nets), then the nets are not a confounder. They are part of the treatment, and any effect they have is intended to be measured as part of the outcome analysis. In this case, the presence or absence of improvements would be an aspect of the treatment definition, not an uncontrolled extraneous variable.

- If, alternatively, net improvements occurred but were balanced across treatment groups (for example, implemented in both control and experimental arms or randomized independently of treatment assignment), then they would not confound the treatment effect because their distribution is independent of the treatment, and any net-related outcome differences would be attributable to the defined intervention rather than a separate, unbalanced factor.

- A confounder would be something not part of the intervention that happened to vary between groups and also affect the outcome. If these improvements were part of the study protocol or were distributed evenly, they fail to meet the criteria for a confounder.

In summary, the statement is deemed False because, under typical experimental design, improvements in mosquito nets would not be a confounding factor if they are incorporated into the treatment or are balanced/randomized across groups, rather than representing an uncontrolled, extraneous variable that correlates with both treatment and outcome.

Note: If, in a specific scenario, net improvements happened unevenly and independently of treatment assignment, then they could become a confounder. The key criterion is whether the variable is associated with both the treatment and the outcome and is not part of the intended causal pathway.

CIS-124-HYA-CRN48380 Section 20 Practice

True or False: The improvements in mosquito nets are a confounding factor in this experiment.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Why must researchers control for confounding variables?

Which of the following best describes confounding variables:

A confounding variable is a variable that varies along with the independent variable.

Married people tend to live longer than unmarried people. It could be that they take better care of themselves when they have the responsibility of a family. It could also be that

In experimental design, confounding is:

Confounding variables are:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler