For chair conformers, substituents that are directed axial (above/below plane of ring) impart greater steric strain than substituents that are equatorial (directed horizontally away from the ring). Consider the following isomers of C6H12O6 (i – v) in the chair conformation.Which of i – v will be the lowest energy (most stable)?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which chair conformer among i–v will have the lowest energy, i.e., be the most stable, given that axial substituents cause more steric strain than equatorial ones.
Option a: (i). In structure (i), several substituents appear axial (the red OH groups on both sides may be axial positions depending on the chair flip). If many substituents occupy axial sites, steric strain from 1,3-diaxial interactions would be high, making this conformer less stable. Since axial substituents raise energy, (i) would likely be less favorable.
Option b: (ii). Here, it seems that more substituents are in equatorial positions, which minimizes 1,3-diaxial interactions and lowers steric strain. If (ii) places bulky groups equatorially, this conformer should be more stable than those with axial crowding.
Option c: (iii). If (iii) has several bulky groups oriented axially, the steric clash would increase energy again, reducing stability relative to the equatorial-rich conformers. This would typically not be the lowest energy form.
Option d: (iv). Depending on the exact orientation, (iv) could present a mix of axial and equatorial substituents. If it introduces more axial bulk than (ii) but less than (i) or (iii), its stability would lie somewhere in between. Without more precise counting, it is uncertain but not obviously the lowest.
Option e: (v). If (v) reintroduces multiple axial substituents or places bulky groups in positions that cause significant 1,3-diaxial strain, the energy would be higher. Unless its arrangement somehow minimizes interactions more than (ii), it would not be the obvious lowest-energy option.
Overall, the core idea is that the lowest-energy chair is the one with the greatest number of bulky substituents in equatorial positions, thereby minimizing steric interactions. Among the given conformers, (ii) appears to maximize equatorial placement of substituents compared with the others, leading to reduced steric strain and thus lower energy.
Note: The assessment relies on recognizing 1,3-diaxial interactions and equatorial vs axial preferences for substituents on cyclohexane chairs. Visual inspection of axial crowding versus equatorial extension is the key heuristic for ranking these isomers’ stabilities.

My LMS Subjects Quiz 3

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When considering molecular conformations, which of the following statements are true?

Consider the following Newman projections (i – iii) of an alkylhalide showing all the staggered conformations about the C2-C1 bond. Key: X = a bulky halide group.Which of the following lists the conformers, i – iii, from lowest to highest energy?

Consider the Newman projections (i - vi) looking down the C2 - C3 bond in n-butane. Select the LOWEST energy conformer of n-butane?

Consider the Newman projections (i - vi) looking down the C2 - C3 bond in n-butane. Select the highest energy conformer of n-butane?

What is the primary use of distance and angle measurements in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler