Researchers were studying a novel antimicrobial compound. They found that it bound to the active site of an enzyme involved in the synthesis of ubiquinone. Therefore, the compund is a ____________________________inhibitor. In addition, their evidence suggests that the enzyme can still use this compound as a substrate. The rest of the enzymes can not. What would be your interpretation of the data? choose the best answer.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the scenario helps anchor the analysis: Researchers found a compound that binds to the enzyme’s active site involved in ubiquinone synthesis. Interestingly, the enzyme can still use this compound as a substrate, while other enzymes cannot. The task is to select the best interpretation from the given options.

Option 1: Competitive. The product of the enzyme accumulates, which may be toxic as well. This means the antimicrobial will kill microbes by two different mechanisms.
- Evaluation: This option aligns with the idea that the compound binds at the active site, competing with the natural substrate for access to the catalytic site. The statement that the enzyme can still use the compound as a substrate suggests it can be processed in some way, which is a nuanced description sometimes associated with competitive interactions when a molecule can act both as a substrate and an inhibitor under different conditions. The added notion of two mechanisms (inhibition via competition and production of a potentially toxic product) reflects a combined effect: inhibition of ubiquinone synthesis and creation of an alternate metabolic outcome that could contribute to antimicrobial action. This option captures the concept of competitive inhibition at the active site while acknowledging a secondary consequence related to the compound’s metabolism.

Option 2: General. The product of the enzyme accumulates, which may be toxic as well. This means the antimicrobial will easily kill microbes.
- Evaluation: The wording “General” lacks specificity about the mode of inhibition. It does not clarify why binding to the active site constitutes competitive inhibition, nor does it address how the compound being a substrate fits the mechanism. The claim that it will “easily kill microbes” overextends without supporting pharmacodynamic or kinetic justification. This option is vague and oversimplified.

Option 3: Competive. The product of the enzyme accumulates, which may be toxic as well. This means the antimicrobial will kill microbes by a single mechanism.
- Evaluation: This option contains a misspelling—“Competive”—which undermines credibility and may indicate a transcription error. More importantly, predicting a single mechanism contradicts the data implying dual aspects (inhibition plus substrate utilization). The statement about a single mechanism is inconsistent with the evidence that the compound can be a substrate and competes at the active site, which could contribute to multiple effects.

Option 4: Competitive or uncompetitive. The antimicrobial works as a general inhibitor that results in lack of ubiquinone. This will kill microbes that need in aerobic conditions
- Evaluation: This option introduces both competitive and uncompetitive modes, which is not directly supported by the given data. Uncompetitive inhibition implies binding only to the enzyme-substrate complex, which isn’t suggested by the description of active-site binding with the compound also being a substrate. Also, “general inhibitor” and the link to aerobic condition dependence broadens the claim beyond the specific evidence about active-site competition and substrate compatibility.

In summary, Option 1 stands out because it directly ties the active-site binding to competitive inhibition while acknowledging that the compound can also be processed as a substrate, which can contribute to antimicrobial effects through multiple, interacting mechanisms. The other options either misstate the mechanism, rely on vagueness or miss the key clue that the binding and substrate utilization point toward a competitive scenario with potential secondary consequences.

BIOL3611.13541.202610 FA2IndFA2025- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following is NOT correct about a competitive inhibitor of an enzyme?

Identify all the correct ways to finish the sentence, A "competitive inhibitor" of an enzyme binds . A. tighter than substrate B. reversibly to the substrate-binding site C. irreversibly to the substrate-binding site

Question at position 11 If something binds to the active site of an enzyme and blocks the substrate from binding, that is an example ofnoncompetitive inhibitioncooperativitycompetitive inhibition

Question16 E = enzyme, S = Substrate, I = Inhibitor Select the term which best describes the type of enzyme inhibition shown in the diagram above. Select one alternative: Allosteric Non-competitive Competitive Irreversible Lineweaver-Burke ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Which of the following sentences best describes what happens during competitive inhibition of an enzyme?

Students conducting research observe the rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction under various conditions with a fixed amount of enzyme in each sample. When will increasing the substrate concentration likely result in the greatest increase in the reaction rate?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler