The US-American author of one of this week's readings drew an important conclusion from their research on a Philadelphia community. Which of the following most closely describe/s this conclusion?

There may be more than one suitable answer.

Question

The US-American author of one of this week's readings drew an important conclusion from their research on a Philadelphia community. Which of the following most closely describe/s this conclusion?

There may be more than one suitable answer.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the conclusion drawn by a US-American author from research on a Philadelphia community, noting there may be more than one suitable answer. 
Option 1: 'That the community in question experienced a great deal more medical problems than was immediately visible to the authorities.' This aligns with a common historical and sociological finding that communities can endure health and medical issues that are underreported or overlooked by authorities, especially when research highlights hidden suffering or systemic neglect. The reasoning here emphasizes under-recognition and the gap between observed indicators and underlying health burdens, which is a plausible conclusion from in-depth community studies. 
Option 2: 'That the community in question was the result of a long historical development, and not an unfortunate momentary nuisance.' This reflects a historiographical view that communities are shaped by enduring structural forces—economic, social, and political processes—rather than being the product of a single, isolated incident. It suggests a developmental perspective, where problems emerge from longstanding patterns rather than one-off events, which is a credible interpretation in many scholarly analyses of urban or neighborhood history. 
Option 3: 'That the community in question demonstrated a genetic predisposition toward severe congenital disorders.' This statement introduces a genetic explanation for health outcomes. Unless the author explicitly framed the conclusions around genetics, this option risks conflating social determinants with biology, and it may be historically unlikely or unsupported by the described research context. If the work focused on environmental, policy, or structural factors rather than genetics, this would be an inaccurate or overextended interpretation. 
Option 4: 'That the community in question was, in fact, unable or unwilling to improve its situation.' This posits a dichotomy of helplessness or deliberate inaction, which can be a tempting reading but risks blaming the community without considering external constraints, resource availability, or historical oppression. Many rigorous analyses emphasize external barriers and structural constraints rather than attributing stagnation to internal choice alone, so this option could be an overgeneralization or misinterpretation unless the author provided direct evidence of such agency or its lack. 
Option 5: 'That the community in question was the result of a long historical development, and not an unfortunate momentary nuisance.' This appears to be a near-duplicate of Option 2, reinforcing the view that the situation stems from persistent historical processes rather than a transient issue. The repetition strengthens the historiographical interpretation, but ensure you’re not counting it twice; if the source indeed presents that developmental framing, this would be a valid understanding. 
In summary, the options that express a nuanced, historically grounded, and evidence-based view of chronic, systemic community health issues (Options 1 and 2, and potentially 5 if distinct in the source) are more defensible interpretations. The options that attribute health patterns to genetics (Option 3) or to internal community incapacity or willful neglect (Option 4) require careful conditioning on the author’s specific evidence; without that, they risk misrepresenting the research conclusions.

HPSC2011 (ND) Quiz Week 3

The US-American author of one of this week's readings drew an important conclusion from their research on a Philadelphia community. Which of the following most closely describe/s this conclusion? There may be more than one suitable answer.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler