The drafters of the U.S. Constitution believed:

I. That economic disintegration could result if states were free to tax imports and exports.

II. That the federal government should share regulation of international commerce with the states.

Question

The drafters of the U.S. Constitution believed:

I. That economic disintegration could result if states were free to tax imports and exports.

II. That the federal government should share regulation of international commerce with the states.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents two statements about the drafters' beliefs regarding economic regulation and asks you to evaluate them.
Option 1: 'I only.' This would be correct if the drafters believed that economic disintegration could occur if states were free to tax imports and exports, but not that the federal government should share regulation of international commerce with the states. Historical context shows they were concerned about state-imposed barriers to trade (such as tariffs on imports and exports) and aimed to create a stronger federal role in commerce to prevent fragmentation of the economy. The Constitution centralizes power over interstate and international commerce in the federal government, notably in the Commerce Clause, which argues against a cooperative-sharing model with the states.
Option 2: 'II only.' This claims the drafters believed the federal government should share regulation with the states. In reality, the constitutional design emphasizes a stronger central authority over commerce and limits the states’ ability to obstruct or jointly regulate international trade with the federal government. Therefore, this option contradicts the intended balance of power established by the framers, who sought uniform federal control rather than a shared regulatory framework.
Option 3: 'Both I and II.' Since II is not supported by the constitutional approach to commerce, asserting both would be incorrect. The combination would require accepting a shared regulatory arrangement with the states, which does not align with the framers’ emphasis on federal supremacy in trade matters.
Option 4: 'Neither I nor II.' This would imply that the framers did not believe economic disintegration could result from state taxation of trade and also did not advocate for federal control over commerce. Given the emphasis on preventing economic fragmentation through a strong federal role and the historical concern about state barriers, this option misstates the predisposition toward federal regulation over commerce and would be misleading about I’s historical interpretation.

BLAW 315-001 Quiz 6 - Ch. 8 Quiz

The drafters of the U.S. Constitution believed: I. That economic disintegration could result if states were free to tax imports and exports. II. That the federal government should share regulation of international commerce with the states.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler