How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When examining how clinical prediction compares to statistical prediction, we need to evaluate what clinicians tend to weight in their judgments.
Option 1: 'Clinical prediction overweights case characteristics' – While clinicians often focus on specific case details, this option ignores a key systemic factor: base rates. On its own, it is incomplete because it doesn’t mention the neglect of base rates that statistical models typically incorporate.
Option 2: 'Clinical prediction is subject to loss aversion' – Loss aversion is a concept from behavioral economics about avoiding losses more than acquiring gains. It is not the primary, well-documented reason clinical prediction underperforms compared to statistical prediction in aggregate outcomes, so this attribute is not the main explanation here.
Option 3: 'Clinical prediction ignores base rates' – This captures an important element, since clinicians frequently focus on the presenting case without properly weighting base rates in the population. However, stating it alone misses the parallel issue that case characteristics are also overemphasized, which together with base-rate neglect explains much of the discrepancy.
Option 4: 'Clinical prediction overweights case characteristics and ignores base rates' – This option combines the two central problems: an overreliance on vivid or salient case details (case characteristics) and the failure to properly incorporate base-rate information. This pairing is a well-supported description of why clinical predictions often underperform relative to statistical models.
Option 5: 'Clinical prediction is subject to loss aversion and overweights case characteristics' – While overemphasis on case features is true, pairing it with loss aversion adds a less central mechanism to the standard explanation, making this option less accurate than option 4.
In summary, multiple-choice options that mention ignoring base rates or overemphasizing case characteristics pinpoint core biases of clinical judgment, but the most complete and accurate statement is the one that combines both: overemphasizing case characteristics while neglecting base rates. This holistic description aligns with the established understanding of why statistical prediction tends to outperform clinical prediction in aggregate across cases.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Practice Exam- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler