In "The New Era in World Politics" author Samuel Huntington discusses the "bloody clash of clans" in Somalia and the genocide in Rwanda to illustrate...

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here is the question restated for clarity: In "The New Era in World Politics" author Samuel Huntington discusses the "bloody clash of clans" in Somalia and the genocide in Rwanda to illustrate...

Option analysis:
- Option (the provided answer): "Clashes within civilizations that have less chance of becoming international conflicts."
  This option suggests that Huntington’s point is that intra-civilizational clashes or clan-based fights are unlikely to spill over into international wars. However, in Huntington’s framework the central claim is that conflicts will increasingly occur along civilizational fault lines, i.e., between different civilizations, rather than within them. The examples from Somalia (clan-based violence within a country) and Rwanda (ethnic violence within a single country) are often cited to illustrate intrasthetical conflict and internal societal fragmentation, not to emphasize that such clashes are unlikely to become international. Therefore, this statement misreads Huntington’s core thrust: he emphasizes civilizational clashes as the source of future international tension, while the examples cited are more about internal, intra-civilizational or intra-state violence rather than intra-civilizational clashes that stay contained.

- If there were other options (not provided in the data), we would assess each against Huntington’s thesis:
  - An option claiming that the bloodshed demonstrates conflicts along civilizational fault lines spilling into international arena would be inconsistent with the Somalia and Rwanda cases, which are primarily intra-country and intra-clan/ethnic. In that case the analysis would note the distinction between intrastate/ethnic clashes and interstate civilizational clashes.
  - An option claiming that these examples show non-state actors are dominant in future conflicts would require supporting Hobbesian or post-state theories; while Huntington does discuss the erosion of state-centric conflict, the specific emphasis remains on civilizations and civilizational fault lines, not solely non-state actors.
  - An option asserting that these events show that violence is inevitable in the modern era regardless of civilization would overgeneralize Huntington’s nuanced view of civilizational dynamics and governance structures.

- In terms of reasoning flaws and misconceptions:
  - A claim that intra-clan or intra-ethnic violence inherently proves that civilizations will not clash internationally misplaces Huntington’s emphasis on civilizational boundaries as fault lines for international conflict.
  - Assuming these examples demonstrate peaceful coexistence within civilizations would contradict the existence of brutal genocides; the point of citing Rwanda and Somalia is often to highlight fragility and the potential for severe violence within civilizational contexts.
  - Treating the Somalia clan dynamics as evidence that civilizations are monolithic or monotypic ignores the complex internal diversity and the way external actors and state structures interact with local loyalties.

- Summary perspective: The examples are commonly discussed to illustrate deep-seated intra-societal fractures and the fragility of state authority, not to exemplify weak international contagion of civilizational conflict. The claim that these cases illustrate only intra-civilizational clashes with little international spillover is a narrow reading that conflicts with Huntington’s broader emphasis on civilizational fault lines as seeds of future international conflict. The nuances of these cases require recognizing both intra-state violence and the potential (or lack thereof) for cross-civilizational tension, depending on the specific historical and geopolitical context.

Note: If there were additional answer choices, each would need similar scrutiny against Huntington’s main thesis, distinguishing between intra-civilizational violence and interstate, civilizationally framed conflict, while identifying common misinterpretations such as conflating internal fragmentation with international war potential.

Intro to Global Spring... Quiz on Section 14 reading and lecture

In "The New Era in World Politics" author Samuel Huntington discusses the "bloody clash of clans" in Somalia and the genocide in Rwanda to illustrate...

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In "The Clash of Ignorance" author Edward Said described Huntington's basic paradigm of the "West versus the Rest" as a very crude reformulation of the Cold War opposition.

In "The New Era in World Politics" author Samuel Huntington argued that in the Post- Cold War world, the most important distinction between peoples is not ideological, political, or economic. It is...

Which of the following match arguments made by Samuel Huntington in "The New Era in World Politics" about the post-Cold War world? (select all that apply)

Match the following information with the correct name. Samuel Huntington

Match the following information with the correct name. Samuel Huntington

Match the following information with the correct name. Samuel Huntington

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler