Question at position 30 Which is the correct order of time for these events? She developed a strong interest in technology → She moved to Brazil → She became known for her TED TalkShe became known for her TED Talk → She applied to MIT → She moved to BrazilShe became known for her TED Talk → She grew up in Brazil → She applied to MITShe developed a strong interest in technology→ She studied at MIT → She worked on many projects and traveled to share her message

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's lay out the question clearly and examine each proposed sequence in turn, matching logical progression of a typical tech-focused biography.
Option 1: 'She developed a strong interest in technology → She moved to Brazil → She became known for her TED Talk'
This path places a move to Brazil after developing interest, followed by TED Talk recognition. While plausible in a general sense, the sequence skips any indication of formal education or early career steps that often precede widespread recognition, such as advanced study or project work. It also sets up the TED Talk before any demonstrated broader impact, which slightly disrupts a typical career arc.
Option 2: 'She became known for her TED Talk → She applied to MIT → She moved to Brazil'
Here, fame from a TED Talk precedes applying to MIT and moving to Brazil. This sequencing is unusual because one would typically pursue education (MIT) before achieving notable recognition that could propel further opportunities, not after being widely known. The later move to Brazil also lacks a clear cause-and-effect connection to the TED Talk fame, making the chain feel less coherent.
Option 3: 'She became known for her TED Talk → She grew up in Brazil → She applied to MIT'
This option starts with TED Talk recognition, then retroactively places childhood in Brazil, and then applies to MIT. The chronological inconsistency is evident: growing up in Brazil would logically precede any national or international recognition, and applying to MIT would generally come after foundational education. The order disrupts a natural life timeline.
Option 4: 'She developed a strong interest in technology → She studied at MIT → She worked on many projects and traveled to share her message'
This sequence begins with interest in technology, then education at MIT, followed by ongoing project work and dissemination of ideas. It presents a coherent, plausible progression: cultivate interest, pursue formal study at a prestigious institution, then leverage that education through projects and outreach. The latter part—working on projects and traveling to share a message—fits a typical trajectory of someone using MIT training to impact a broader audience.
In evaluating the options, we look for a logical, pedagogically plausible career arc: early interest, followed by formal study, then applied work and outreach. Option 4 best matches that progression, while Options 1–3 introduce ordinal jumps or reversals that weaken the coherence of a biography’s timeline.
Overall, the reasoning across these choices emphasizes consistency in cause-and-effect sequencing, the natural order of education before recognition or broad impact, and a clear throughline from interest to study to actions and outreach. The comparisons highlight why the other options misplace moments in time or assume improbable causal order. The chosen sequence aligns with a typical, coherent narrative of development in technology-focused work and public engagement.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which document organization structure would you use to outline or highlight the progress of a project or a step-by-step procedure?

What organizational pattern does this speech follow? I. Planting the seeds to grow pineapples II. Taking care of pineapple plants when they are growing III. How they harvest the Pineapple when it is ripe

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler