Why is the Jordan-Nike partnership considered a benchmark for modern celebrity endorsement?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Why is the Jordan-Nike partnership considered a benchmark for modern celebrity endorsement?
Option 1: 'It generated the highest short-term sales of any sports endorsement.' While high sales can indicate effectiveness, this option overstates the claim and emphasizes short-term performance. Benchmark endorsements are typically evaluated on broader impact, brand equity, and strategic influence rather than a single peak of short-term sales.
Option 2: 'It was the longest-running athlete endorsement contract.' Duration alone does not define a benchmark. Endorsement programs differ in length, but longevity does not inherently capture why Jordan-Nike is seen as groundbreaking; other programs may outlast it, or vary in scope without establishing a new standard.
Option 3: 'It created a sustainable business model that transcended traditional endorsement limitations.' This aligns with the broader view of the Jordan-Nike partnership: it integrated product design, athlete-driven storytelling, and cross-market reach to build a durable, scalable ecosystem beyond simply paying for an athlete’s image. The collaboration leveraged product lines, cultural influence, and global distribution, creating enduring value and a template for future partnerships.
Option 4: 'It went beyond domestic markets to focus on global ones.' Global reach is important, but by itself it does not capture what makes the Jordan-Nike collaboration a benchmark. Other campaigns have pursued global markets as well, so this statement alone does not uniquely define the partnership as a benchmark for modern endorsement.
In evaluating these options, emphasis falls on the enduring business model and holistic integration of brand strategy, product development, and multi-market reach described in Option 3, rather than temporary sales spikes, contract length, or merely global expansion without a sustainable framework.

Why is the Jordan-Nike partnership considered a benchmark for modern celebrity endorsement?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What need is Dior willing to satisfy by bringing Johnny Depp in their ads?

True of false? Celebrity endorsers can often endorse as many products as they'd like without fear of losing specific product meaning

Which combination correctly represents all elements of the 5 Cs framework for celebrity selection?

Which statement best captures the evolution of celebrity endorsement in advertising?

According to the match-up hypothesis, why might an athlete's endorsement be effective for both sports and luxury brands?

When tennis great Roger Federer appears on print ads for Rolex watches, he is acting as a(n) Blank ______ leader.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler