According to the match-up hypothesis, why might an athlete's endorsement be effective for both sports and luxury brands?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating why an athlete's endorsement could be effective for both sports and luxury brands under the match-up hypothesis, we need to examine how the athlete's perceived attributes relate to the product category. 
Option 1: 'The athlete's fame and popularity matter more than the specific product match.' While fame can help with attention, the match-up hypothesis asserts that effectiveness depends on the fit between the athlete's attributes and the product, not fame alone. This choice overlooks the crucial element of attribute-product congruence. 
Option 2: 'Attributes of the athlete like achievement and success can align with different product categories.' This matches the core idea: athletes are seen as symbols of achievement, excellence, and high performance, which can be congruent with both sports gear (performance and capability) and luxury goods (aspirational success, prestige). The cross-category alignment explains why endorsements can transfer credibility across brands that share those attributes. 
Option 3: 'Luxury products don't require specific attribute alignment.' On the contrary, the match-up hypothesis emphasizes the importance of aligning the athlete's perceived traits with the product's image; neglecting alignment reduces credibility and effectiveness, so this statement is incorrect. 
Option 4: 'Athletes are universally credible endorsers for any product.' This overgeneralizes credibility; endorsement effectiveness depends on how well the athlete's attributes fit the product category. If the product lacks a plausible link to the athlete's strengths, the endorsement may feel inauthentic, making this claim inaccurate. 
In summary, the most coherent explanation under the match-up framework is that the athlete's attributes like achievement and success can map onto multiple product categories, creating meaningful associations across sports and luxury brands. The other options either overemphasize fame, ignore the need for match, or assume universal credibility without regard to alignment.

According to the match-up hypothesis, why might an athlete's endorsement be effective for both sports and luxury brands?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What need is Dior willing to satisfy by bringing Johnny Depp in their ads?

True of false? Celebrity endorsers can often endorse as many products as they'd like without fear of losing specific product meaning

Which combination correctly represents all elements of the 5 Cs framework for celebrity selection?

Which statement best captures the evolution of celebrity endorsement in advertising?

Why is the Jordan-Nike partnership considered a benchmark for modern celebrity endorsement?

When tennis great Roger Federer appears on print ads for Rolex watches, he is acting as a(n) Blank ______ leader.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler