Suppose you are studying a dataset of sales by county (table 1). Unfortunately, you are missing the county codes, so you need to compare names. In your dataset, county names appear as "COOK", "KNOX", "AUTAUGA", "NEW CASTLE", etc. You want to match (join) this information with another table (table 2) where counties are named as "Cook", "Knox", "Autauga", "New Castle". Which of the following would allow you to perform the match?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: You have two tables with county names, but table 1 uses all-uppercase codes like "COOK", "KNOX", "AUTAUGA" while table 2 uses mixed case like "Cook", "Knox", "Autauga". You want to join these tables by county name. Which option would allow a successful match?

Option 1: Keep table 1 unchanged and use tolower() in table 2.
- Why this fails: Table 1 values are in uppercase (COOK). If you convert table 2 to lowercase (Cook -> cook, Knox -> knox, Autauga -> autauga), you still have a mismatch because COOK (uppercase) != cook (lowercase). Case must be aligned in both sides for a direct string equality join.

Option 2: Keep table 1 unchanged and use toupper() in table 2.
- Why this works: Table 1 has COOK, KNOX, AUTAUGA in uppercase. If you transform table 2’s names to uppercase (Cook -> COOK, Knox -> KNOX, Autauga -> AUTAUGA), the strings become identical and a standard equality join will succeed. This leverages the fact that the content is the same alphabetically, just with different casing, so normalizing the case on one side enables a correct match.

Option 3: Use tolower() in table 1 and toupper() in table 2.
- Why this fails: If you convert table 1 to lowercase (COOK -> cook) while table 2 is converted to uppercase (Cook -> COOK), you end up with cook vs COOK, which are not equal due to case differences. The two sides must be brought to the same case, not swapped to opposite cases.

Option 4: Use toupper() in table 1 and tolower() in table 2.
- Why this fails: This creates the reverse mismatch of option 3: COOK (uppercase) on table 1 becomes COOK, while table 2 becomes cook. Again, the two sides would be cook vs COOK, not equal, so the join would fail.

Option 5: Use tolower() in table 1 and keep table 2 unchanged.
- Why this fails: Table 1 becomes cook, whereas table 2 remains Cook. cook != Cook due to case sensitivity, so the join would not match.

Additional considerations: If there are additional discrepancies like extra spaces or punctuation, you’d also want to normalize those (trim whitespace, standardize spacing) before joining. However, focusing solely on case differences, normalizing one side to match the other’s case is the standard and simplest approach for a direct equality join.

ECON3310001.1251 Quiz 2: Strings

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler