Which of the following is not one of the three main reasons for developing a second malignancy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, first identify what is typically considered the main factors for developing a second malignancy. The widely recognized contributors generally include: prior treatment modalities (such as radiation therapy or certain chemotherapies) that can induce secondary cancers, underlying genetic susceptibility that predisposes individuals to multiple cancers, and lifestyle factors or ongoing behaviors (continued lifestyle) that elevate risk over time. With that framework in mind, let's evaluate each option.

Option a) Viral infections: This choice would be associated with some cancers, as certain viruses can contribute to oncogenesis; however, when discussing the main reasons people develop a second malignancy after an initial cancer, viral infections are not commonly enumerated among the three primary drivers. They may play a role in specific cancer etiologies, but they are not typically categorized as a primary contributing factor to second malignancies in the standard framework.

Option b) Treatment modality (RT, chemotherapy): This is frequently cited as a major contributor to second malignancies. Ionizing radiation and certain chemotherapeutic agents have mutagenic effects and long latency periods that can lead to new cancers years after treatment.

Option c) Genetic susceptibility: A patient’s inherited or genetic predisposition to cancer is a well-established contributor to the risk of developing subsequent malignancies, independent of treatment exposure.

Option d) Continued lifestyle: Ongoing lifestyle factors, such as smoking, alcohol use, dietary patterns, and physical inactivity, are recognized as important modifiable risk factors that can influence the likelihood of additional cancers and impact overall cancer risk over time.

In evaluating which item does not belong among the three main reasons, it helps to categorize options b, c, and d as commonly accepted primary contributors in the context of second malignancies. While viral infections (option a) can be associated with certain cancers, they are not typically grouped with treatment modality, genetic susceptibility, and continued lifestyle as the three principal drivers of second malignancies in standard medical summaries. The difference lies in the recurring emphasis on treatment-related risks, inherent genetic risk, and ongoing behavioral risk, whereas viral etiology is more disease-specific and not universally a primary driver of second cancers across cancers in general.

Thus, when distinguishing which option is not among the three main reasons, the reasoning hinges on the common frameworks used in oncology for secondary cancer risk, where viral infections are not listed as a primary trio alongside treatment, genetics, and lifestyle. Being aware of these distinctions helps clarify why this option is treated as not part of that core group in many clinical teachings.

Which of the following is not one of the three main reasons for developing a second malignancy?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

The most established cause of lung cancer is:

Which of the following is a factor increasing cancer risk?

True or False: Although cancer is considered a non-communicable disease, risk factors for cancers include communicable diseases.

Which of the most common risk factor for cancer across all cancer types?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单