A report by an international NGO has identified serious human rights violations at one of your company’s key suppliers in Southeast Asia, including excessive working hours and unsafe conditions. The supplier has denied the allegations and invited your company to conduct its own inspection. Changing suppliers would increase costs by 15% and delay production by approximately two months.If the company wants to apply virtue ethics, which of the following approaches best demonstrates this framework?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The scenario presents a real-world ethical dilemma involving a supplier with serious human rights concerns. We need to evaluate which option best aligns with virtue ethics, which emphasizes character, moral integrity, and the cultivation of virtuous practices over merely following rules or calculating outcomes.

Option a: Continue with the supplier while waiting for more evidence, as changing would be costly and disruptive. This approach prioritizes cost and disruption avoidance, while delaying action in the face of credible allegations. It reflects prudence about operations but shows potential negligence of moral responsibility and loyalty to human rights; it does not foreground virtues like stewardship, courage, or accountability.

Option b: Require the supplier to address issues through a third-party certification program, avoiding direct involvement. This choice shifts responsibility away from the company’s leadership and reduces direct moral engagement. Virtue ethics would favor active personal integrity and responsibility from the actors involved, whereas relying on a program externalizes judgment and may abdicate the company’s duty to model principled conduct.

Option c: Conduct a thorough investigation while simultaneously developing alternative supplier relationships, demonstrating both diligence and responsibility. This option embodies several virtuous attributes: diligence in seeking truth, responsibility to stakeholders (employees, communities, and shareholders), and prudence in ensuring supply continuity while not compromising ethics. It reflects a character-oriented approach, balancing due diligence with the practical need to avoid complicity by dependence on a potentially amoral supplier, all while building virtuous, sustainable alternatives.

Option d: Immediately cut ties with the supplier regardless of cost, to avoid any association with potential rights violations. While this demonstrates a strong stance against human rights abuses, it may reflect an impulsive or uncompromising virtue without due consideration of practical implications, stakeholder dependencies, or the possibility of remediation. Virtue ethics would consider whether such a hasty action aligns with a well-formed character that also weighs fairness, stewardship, and the capacity to mentor or remediate when appropriate.

In summary, option c most closely aligns with virtue ethics by combining moral diligence (investigation) with prudent, responsible action (developing alternative suppliers), thereby cultivating virtuous organizational behavior rather than relying solely on cost-based calculations, external certifications, abrupt penalties, or passive procrastination.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When approached from a virtue ethics perspective, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is primarily focused on

What is the key purpose of applying multiple ethical frameworks to business decisions?

Which of the following best characterizes businesses operating at the Preconventional level?

More Practical Tools for International Students

Exam Browser Assistant

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler